00:02:42 *** mama (me@cryto-AC549E18.guilhem.org) has joined #crytocc 00:03:43 so 00:04:05 it turns out if you phone the number on the wikileaks website someone actually answers 00:05:14 which is surprising tbh 00:08:55 awsm 00:16:13 *** Zoned2 (zoned@cryto-1ADE6D47.tor.primus.ca) has joined #crytocc 00:18:36 *** Zoned has quit (Ping timeout) 00:27:13 *** x (foobar@BF9A7830.93D77D28.7035584F.IP) has joined #crytocc 00:32:00 lysobit: heh 00:32:09 also, I am messing about with suse studio 00:32:15 suse stuff is really surprisingly extensible 00:32:27 open build service, suse studio, Python bindings for the package manager... 00:32:39 but looks like I'll be doing some more packaging soon :/ 00:41:19 joepie91:) is there a way to see if I've approached my b/w cap on ramhost? 00:41:50 cayce: it's in your panel 00:42:17 er 00:42:38 client area -> products+services > details tells me nothing 00:43:32 it tells me that I've paid, when my next bill is due, and how much 00:43:35 :/ 00:44:30 your VPS panel I mean 00:44:35 *** mama has quit (Ping timeout) 00:44:38 not the billing panel 00:46:03 where is that >_> 00:46:11 It's not linked anywhere in the billing panel 00:46:22 (and why isn't it?) 00:46:38 http://www.ramhost.us/?page=members 00:46:44 click the appropriate link depending on whether it was openvz or kvm 00:46:45 :P 00:47:03 and idk why it isn't 00:48:12 * cayce sighs 00:48:50 there we go 00:49:01 * cayce hates non-sso systems 00:49:40 http://owely.com/6oBpQd 00:49:43 getting there, but not quite... 00:50:17 oh 00:50:18 0.397 GB of 500 GB (0.08%) 00:50:20 very nice 00:50:36 cayce: you don't happen to have a hint as to why the above is happening? 00:51:03 whatever handles those window edges crashed 00:51:28 that's my guess 00:51:29 the problem is that what handles the window edges, also handles the close button and such 00:51:31 so clearly it didn't break entirely 00:51:32 :| 00:51:34 (xfwm4) 00:52:40 weird 00:52:44 it works fine under root user 00:52:49 (with default theme) 00:52:51 but not under local user 00:52:52 permissions on the images? 00:52:53 (with selected theme) 00:53:01 there's more bugs 00:53:06 z-index on focus doesn't work 00:53:22 oh wait 00:53:22 it does 00:53:22 nvm 00:54:04 haha what 00:54:09 root-owned config dirs in the user dir 00:55:08 why is that root:root 00:55:15 weird 00:55:35 xnoise also broken 00:55:39 same reason it seems 00:56:14 right 00:56:16 SSH time 00:56:19 VNC is pissing me of 00:56:20 off * 00:57:48 haha oops 00:57:52 forgot to add yast2 firewall module 01:07:29 *** Amnesthesia has quit (Ping timeout) 01:09:46 welllllll 01:09:47 cayce: 01:09:47 http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7010284 01:09:51 this would explain the problem 01:28:21 that'd do it 01:29:32 oh jesus christt 01:29:33 http://askubuntu.com/questions/270816/xubuntu-title-bar-missing 01:29:43 It was in the default Xubuntu theme "GREYBIRD". To fix this, simply go to: Settings Manager -> Window manager and change the theme to anything other than greybird or greybird_compact. 01:29:51 YEAH THANKS EXCEPT THAT WAS THE THEME I WAS TRYING TO USE AND IT WORKS FINE HERE 01:29:53 ffs 01:31:46 https://github.com/shimmerproject/Greybird/issues/12 01:35:27 :< 01:35:36 NP: [Netsky - Puppy] [2] [1100kbps] DeaDBeeF 0.5.6-3jane 01:35:51 getting suspicious of the greybird version in my appliance now 01:36:48 I just finished icetwy's video, which was awesome until stallman got up 01:36:57 guy has no idea how to public speak lol 01:37:07 greaaaaaaaaat, looks like suse ships an ancient version of greybird 01:37:08 for fucks sake 01:37:26 whos the package maintainer 01:37:26 email em 01:37:31 no 01:37:36 I'll just grab from X11:xfce 01:37:39 it carries a newer one 01:37:42 where this should be fixed 01:37:55 (package search is awesome!) 01:38:32 oh man, my twitter feed is gold right now 01:38:56 all covering techcrunch hackathon that just finished 01:38:58 comedy gold 01:39:07 lol 01:39:10 guess: titstare 01:39:12 yes 01:39:17 again, comedy gold 01:39:42 "nothing like typing fake masturbating app into google" 01:39:53 because journalists are going around asking everyone for comment 01:39:57 and not journalists too 01:41:11 NP: [Netsky - When Darkness Falls (feat. Bridgette Amofah)] [2] [1012kbps] DeaDBeeF 0.5.6-3jane 01:41:31 sounds like it's an app that shows you boobs on command? 01:41:39 "I think you're looking for google" 01:42:11 http://owely.com/56Cene 01:42:16 let's see how much shit will break now! 01:42:31 well probably nothing 01:42:32 but still :P 01:43:26 it's almost 4 AM 01:43:39 I should be sleeping, not dicking around with custom distros 01:44:49 man, their tagline is gold 01:44:58 "It's the breast, most titillating fun you cans have." 01:45:28 It's a tempest in a teacup, but I think it's funny 01:45:37 not appropriate AT ALL, but at least they didn't half-ass it 01:46:35 *** KaEsse (KaEsse@cryto-C6F276AD.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) has joined #crytocc 01:46:38 oh man 01:46:45 adria richards was on stage 01:46:46 oh man 01:46:50 I would pay anything to see her face 01:46:52 ANYTHING 01:47:16 wwiii here we come 01:47:29 =) 01:48:26 *** KaEsse is now known as KoalaStomper 01:49:39 I just hate that woman 01:49:54 She's so manipulative of everything, and not even for good 01:51:01 not hate, tbh, I'd probably get along with her in person as long as she didn't start talking about her twisted version of feminism 01:51:19 unfortunately, that's her job so it's pretty unlikely that wouldn't happen 02:00:05 whoo, greybird no longer broken! 02:00:44 http://owely.com/7l0Ven 02:01:03 and everything is generally nicer now 02:02:01 user@linux:~> google-chrome 02:02:02 Aborted 02:02:02 user@linux:~> 02:02:02 uh... 02:02:19 that's... not supposed to happen 02:04:03 sudo 02:04:15 why would I sudo google-chrome? 02:04:20 i have no idea 02:04:28 im pretending to know something about linux 02:04:31 ;) 02:05:15 what in the fuck happened to my terminal font rendering 02:05:15 http://owely.com/11eAKce 02:05:59 I don't know, but it's shittier than usual 02:06:07 you have the green rectangle monkey infection 02:07:55 ive heard of that 02:07:56 nasty 02:28:02 mmm, sunday night 02:56:11 NP: [Imagine Dragons - Radioactive] [Night Visions] [986kbps] DeaDBeeF 0.5.6-3jane 02:56:17 first time I've listened to the original haha 03:44:30 joepie91: do you believe ISPs will ever stop allowing incoming connections for home networks? 03:45:06 everyone: can anyone list applications aside from bittorent which rely on the ability to recieve incoming connections? 03:45:31 * twitchyl1quid64 pokes MK_FG joepie91 03:55:12 it's going to become harder over time because instead of deploying ipv6 they're mostly preparing to deploy carrier grade nat 03:55:46 anything that is even slightly peer to peer requires incoming connections to run WELL, though many work around that 04:14:39 cayce: do most gaming networks use a P2P system? 04:16:38 most game distributions systems do 04:17:56 good 04:18:03 I dont think many ISPs would mess with that then 04:18:18 they would be publicly denounced and the gaming community would move away from that carrier 04:19:13 I think we need webRTC to become widespread ASAP 04:19:58 so ISPs cant disable incoming connections without breaking my applications and causing issues with their customers 04:20:32 this will already happen to some extent, as torrenters will move away from certain ISPs and gamers aswell 04:20:43 a big enough group to make a sizeable dent in their profits 04:20:49 04:23:20 all of blizzard's shit is torrents, same with many popular mmo's which use either bittorrent DNA or pando 04:23:23 there we go 04:23:27 sorry was trying to find the name 04:23:59 isp's are already on a path to cgnat 04:24:01 good luck 04:25:44 *** aLLamoox (aLLamoox@F02418A1.95369BB3.E1DAE158.IP) has joined #crytocc 04:25:56 *** joepie91 has quit (Ping timeout) 04:26:43 cayce: do you think we will still have NAT on ipv6? 04:26:54 nah 04:27:05 *** joepie91 (joepie91@cryto-3E6002EF.direct-adsl.nl) has joined #crytocc 04:27:10 problem is passing ipv6 through shitty old ipv4only stuff 04:29:12 not really 04:29:18 DS-Lite tunnels 04:48:02 *** aLLamoox has quit (Ping timeout) 04:48:44 *** aLLamoox (aLLamoox@F02418A1.95369BB3.E1DAE158.IP) has joined #crytocc 05:05:33 *** HiveResearch has quit (Ping timeout) 05:19:44 *** aLLamoox has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** joepie91 has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** x has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** Ari has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** tintin has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** LapAnon has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** neksip has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** ebola has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** Ishaq has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** IR601 has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** Summerfag6532 has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** staticsafe has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** MK_FG has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** norbert79 has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** twitchyl1quid64 has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** truetravesty has quit (nexus.cryto.net buffalo.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** KoalaStomper has quit (nexus.cryto.net sputnik.cryto.net) 05:19:44 *** lysobit has quit (nexus.cryto.net sputnik.cryto.net) 05:21:25 *** KoalaStomper (KaEsse@cryto-C6F276AD.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) has joined #crytocc 05:21:25 *** lysobit (musalbas@localhost) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** aLLamoox (aLLamoox@F02418A1.95369BB3.E1DAE158.IP) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** joepie91 (joepie91@cryto-3E6002EF.direct-adsl.nl) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** x (foobar@BF9A7830.93D77D28.7035584F.IP) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** Ari (Ari@Ari.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** tintin (tintin@tintin.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** LapAnon (Adrian@LapAnon.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** neksip (neksip@neksip.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** ebola (ebola@ebola.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** Ishaq (Ishaq@cryto-6C73979.rf.usr.sh) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** IR601 (root@IR601.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** Summerfag6532 (coolstory@CF4976EA.D6CB46C6.D95AF0A6.IP) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** staticsafe (ss@staticsafe.py) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** MK_FG (MK_FG@MKFG-91968.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** norbert79 (Norbi@cryto-104FD98D.org) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** twitchyl1quid64 (twitchyliq@cryto-4C6807BE.cinfuserver.com) has joined #crytocc 05:21:27 *** truetravesty (truetraves@7ABB88F7.2C566207.79E6D716.IP) has joined #crytocc 05:25:08 *** x has quit (Input/output error) 06:07:47 *** KoalaStomper has quit (Ping timeout) 06:10:18 *** joepie91 has quit (Ping timeout) 06:10:49 *** joepie91 (joepie91@cryto-3E6002EF.direct-adsl.nl) has joined #crytocc 06:11:24 *** tintin has quit (Ping timeout) 06:13:24 *** tintin (tintin@5DCFB179.164598E0.B7613ADF.IP) has joined #crytocc 06:59:11 *** aLLamoox has quit (Ping timeout) 07:09:13 *** crytocc331 (crytocc331@cryto-206E7C9C.stjo.sta.suddenlink.net) has joined #crytocc 07:10:03 *** crytocc331 has parted #crytocc () 07:23:37 *** h8R (niko@79A03AC3.73247D40.33CE73B2.IP) has joined #crytocc 08:40:27 *** Ishaq has quit (Ping timeout) 08:55:26 *** Ishaq (Ishaq@cryto-6C73979.rf.usr.sh) has joined #crytocc 10:03:30 *** tintin has quit (Ping timeout) 10:05:04 *** T0R_till (T0R_till@cryto-92B43C25.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com) has joined #crytocc 10:06:26 *** T0R_till has quit (User quit: Connection closed) 10:08:15 *** tintin (tintin@tintin.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 10:25:56 *** Amnesthesia (Amnesthesi@cryto-A2D42EFF.studby.hig.no) has joined #crytocc 10:56:42 *** iceTwy (iceTwy@cryto-610769D0.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #crytocc 11:12:23 *** IR601 has quit (Connection reset by peer) 11:19:53 *** iceTwy has quit (Input/output error) 11:22:12 \o/ 11:28:11 joepie91: do you believe ISPs will ever stop allowing incoming connections for home networks? 11:28:18 not really, because it's pretty trivial to work around it 11:28:23 therefore it's kind of pointless to do so 11:32:24 *** IR601 (root@cryto-E0B662A7.abu.se.net) has joined #crytocc 11:48:25 http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/08/wall-street-versus-poor-in-america 11:59:33 *** Ari has quit (Connection reset by peer) 12:47:04 hi all 12:47:24 hi 12:48:27 dont spose you know if fstab is hierarchical 12:48:45 as in if you mount two devices into the same folder 12:48:56 the 1st one will get it and the 2nd will be ignored 12:49:08 YOu can, the last mount overrules the first 12:49:14 and if the 1st one fails the 2nd one gets it 12:49:21 oh the last mount 12:49:23 so if you dismount the second you still have the first 12:49:28 afaik 12:49:49 im trying to make some kinda fallback option for when im not on my lan 12:50:09 could always just write a bash script! 12:50:14 lol 12:50:20 i could couldnt i 12:50:46 check for 1st mount fail then mount the 2nd 12:51:00 ok im gonna bash one out 12:51:03 giggady 12:51:08 Giigidy 12:51:10 :) 12:51:15 I think that's Giggity 12:51:19 lol 12:51:24 Haven't seen Family Guy since season 9 12:51:28 Got bored 12:51:29 :) 12:51:37 how can you correct spelling on a word that does not exist 12:51:49 :P 12:52:05 It doesn't add like that in my head 12:52:11 I listen to the voices inside my head 12:52:14 they all say I am ok 12:52:19 so I am! 12:52:46 so! 12:52:51 my Prosody 0.9 package was published! 12:53:07 OBS is no longer broken! 12:53:07 :p 12:53:19 see http://software.opensuse.org/package/prosody?search_term=prosody 12:54:17 Nice, no OpenSuse around here though 12:56:29 if mount | grep /mnt/music > /dev/null; then 12:56:30 fi 12:56:30 else 12:56:30 mount //newmount/music /mnt/music 12:56:31 fi 12:56:32 shld do it? 12:57:11 ehmmm 12:57:17 Not really... depends of course 12:57:33 are these regular mounts or goes through network? 12:58:02 there networked 12:58:10 the mount point in fstab is on my lan 12:58:30 i need the fallback option to mount a share via the internet 12:58:45 when im not at home 12:58:48 You might want to consider handling timeouts 12:58:52 and such 12:59:06 wouldn't generic SSH access be easier and then manual mounting? :) 13:02:47 *** LapAnon has quit (Ping timeout) 13:04:47 na im gonna have to open a samba share on the server side i have some crazy 2fa ssh auth 13:07:38 Just saying, because CIFS shares have several options too... Anyway think of timeouts too 13:07:41 when coding this 13:08:59 hrm i got the bash script working ok but i think i leave it 13:09:15 i dont really want to open fileshariing to the internet 13:09:38 could always hide it thru openvpn 13:15:01 *** BlackRose (BlackRose@cryto-38489A70.singnet.com.sg) has joined #crytocc 13:19:48 *** joepie91 has quit (Ping timeout) 13:20:34 *** joepie91 (joepie91@cryto-3E6002EF.direct-adsl.nl) has joined #crytocc 13:26:50 *** joepie91 has quit (Ping timeout) 13:27:16 *** joepie91 (joepie91@cryto-3E6002EF.direct-adsl.nl) has joined #crytocc 13:32:32 *** BlackRose has quit (Ping timeout) 13:42:40 *** aHlTat (aHlTat@aHlTat.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 13:53:59 whats the minimum count of machines I need to successfully create a test grid? 13:55:19 h8R: test grid for..? 13:56:19 tahoe-lafs* sorry for beeing such an introvert 13:56:48 oh :P 13:56:55 well, technically you could set up a grid of your own with just one machine 13:57:01 but that would kind of... defeat the point 13:57:17 the best you could do with two machines for redundancy would be duplication 13:57:22 so that's also not terribly interesting 13:57:40 so I guess that 3 nodes is the minimum to do anything really interesting 13:57:42 such as 2-out-of-3 encoding 13:57:57 plus an introducer which you'll probably want to live on some other machine 14:02:54 1 introducer + 3 storage machines? I'm a little bit frustrated with the client role? 14:12:43 h8R: what do you mean? 14:14:40 joepie91, i'm frustrated what is the storage client doing? pulling the information from the storage? 14:15:28 anyways I'm starting with this tutorial http://www.cryto.net/guides/tahoe-debian.html 14:15:41 I think you mean 'confused', not 'frustrated'? 14:16:20 anyway, that guide is only for setting up a storage node 14:16:24 for an existing grid 14:16:27 yeah, excuse my english :) my bulgarian is better 14:16:28 not for setting up a new grid 14:17:10 a 'client' is just an instance of tahoe-lafs that has the ability to access data on the grid 14:17:21 my initial plan was to be part of your network, but I want to experiment with the technology, i'm very interested 14:17:38 a storage server is technically also a client (since it can also access data on the grid), but normally you'd only use the term 'client' for something that *doesn't* act as a storage server 14:17:56 a typical grid is made up of one introducer, one or more storage servers, and zero or more clients 14:18:05 joepie91, i see now 14:18:05 Client is what actually encrypts all your data and has access to all your keys 14:18:12 the introducer is a server that literally introduces nodes to each other 14:18:20 it tells a new node that joins the network, how to connect to the rest 14:18:25 the storage servers store data 14:18:38 and what is normally called a 'client', would use the grid to store or retrieve data but not store anything itsldf 14:18:39 itself * 14:19:28 if you wanted to run a tahoe-lafs grid for your own backups, you could for example rent 4 servers (or VPSes), set one up as an introducer, set up the other three as storage servers 14:19:34 and then install a client on your home PC 14:19:52 all of them connect to the same introducer, and you'll be able to store data on the servers from your home PC, using tahoe-lafs 14:20:02 (that's just an example setup, you can do a lot more stuff) 14:20:41 this goes more in-depth about the technical side: https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/trunk/docs/architecture.rst 14:25:18 *** mama (me@AB3DA3DD.49B673DC.6AAD497F.IP) has joined #crytocc 14:54:24 er 14:54:33 *** mama has quit (Ping timeout) 14:54:39 the pentagon is weighing using airforce bombers in syria :O 14:54:53 that is going to end SO BADLY 14:55:37 *** iceTwy (iceTwy@cryto-610769D0.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #crytocc 14:56:12 *** mama (me@cryto-4DFEB79B.snydernet.net) has joined #crytocc 14:56:34 hmmm 14:56:36 e.e 14:57:32 kawai desuuuu 14:57:42 loggy, pointer? 14:57:42 http://wire.cryto.net/logs/crytocc/2013-09-09#T14-57-42 14:58:37 * cayce sighs 14:59:14 if we send bombers in, they'll be shot down 14:59:15 :/ 14:59:24 there will be losses 14:59:29 syria is not iraq 15:00:59 the other problem is retaliation 15:01:03 they will get raped just as hard 15:01:13 It's possible russia may drag themselves in 15:01:26 IR601:) not in 3 days 15:01:36 XD 15:01:46 syria has much older tech than us, yes, but tech doesn't make up for skill 15:01:54 russia may supply weapons on the sly but they wont publicly go against america 15:01:58 it's one of the reasons we haven't invaded iran 15:02:00 they' 15:02:07 iran would swamp us toe to toe 15:02:31 we have the best everything, but they have 70's and 80's jets and have been flying them every day for as many years 15:02:32 iran is too big to occupy 15:02:36 you're not going to get more skilled pilots 15:03:09 It's like the old timers who use old tech and win because they can "feel it" 15:03:22 that's the situation we'd be in 15:03:53 and yeah, we'd win long run, but we'd lose too 15:06:26 * cayce tries feverishly to reduce the number of tabs 15:08:33 man 15:08:51 I feel for the un inspection team 15:09:01 those motherfuckers have 7 billion people watching 15:17:34 Hm, is there really any defences left though? 15:18:12 Seem to be war going on there for a while, I'd think it should be safe to bomb by now 15:19:20 Also, I think russia wanted to sell AA there, but the money (or something, maybe intl pressure) prevented that deal, so they may not have anything new from us, unless of course it's sikrit 15:27:33 *** Summerfag6532 has quit (Connection reset by peer) 16:06:00 yeah putin's got aa that could wipe some of our shit, ditto on whether syria has it or will 16:08:50 I don't know much about military tech, but state of local industry and military seem to be in quite a disarray since ussr went south and there're no budgets for anything, so I'd rather think it WAS good for 80s-90s, but it's 2013 now :P 16:28:36 *** HiveResearch (HiveResear@developers.developers.developers) has joined #crytocc 16:45:28 joepie91: was thinking the new layout - something must be wrong with my eyes - (no it's not the fact that it looks like windows 8) there's a feeling like it's too kiosk-like 16:47:49 HiveResearch: how do you mean? 16:50:47 try bigger tiles, more subtle outline, sidebar for forums 16:51:13 it's giving me major ADHD looking at it as is 16:51:28 probly just my own weird perception 16:52:49 i like the concept 16:53:12 it's making my brain hurt sideways for some reason 16:54:45 *** mama has quit (Ping timeout) 16:56:22 *** skill3r (skill3r@developers.developers.developers) has joined #crytocc 17:47:25 *** LapAnon (Adrian@LapAnon.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 17:54:33 *** mama (me@cryto-C630644E.is.a.tor.exit.server.torland.is) has joined #crytocc 18:08:51 http://bitcoinmagazine.com/6939/seans-outpost-announces-satoshi-forest/ 18:08:55 .title 18:08:58 joepie91: Sean's Outpost Announces Satoshi Forest, Nine-Acre Sanctuary for the Homeless – Bitcoin Magazine 18:14:02 I remember seeing the original OP on reddit 18:14:59 also 18:15:18 I think there's got to be some sort of conspiracy within internet.bs for holding certain domains 18:15:36 lysobit: ? 18:15:51 *** HiveResearch has quit (Ping timeout) 18:15:56 " Due to a glitch lulzsecurity.com has not been deleted in time and then we decided not to delete but park it. We in the technical department, will look into this issue. However this domain will be deleted next year in July." 18:15:57 suuure 18:17:03 the same thing didn't happen with .net and .org 18:17:54 for about half a year the domain was redirecting to a flash game site with ads 18:21:00 sounds like bog standard domain parking policy 18:21:00 anyway 18:21:09 just ran across this 18:21:13 and it's a really good point: 18:21:14 http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1m0tje/bitcoin_should_market_to_kids/cc4rvgw 18:21:23 "Bitcoin is the lego of economics" 18:22:06 howso 18:22:30 it shares some vital properties with Lego actually 18:22:43 lol 18:22:44 it's relatively easy to build shit with it 18:22:58 it does not impose restrictions on you (other than capabilities) 18:23:09 and you don't need a third party to tell you what you can do with it 18:23:26 (which is exactly why lego got so popular - you could build with it whatever the hell you wanted, even if it wasn't the same as the thing in the manual) 18:23:40 same as gold really 18:23:47 it's more or less a giant building block that just kind of... exists 18:23:52 lysobit: what? absolutely not 18:23:58 it's not "relatively easy to build shit with gold" 18:24:20 messing about with gold has a massive barrier of entry 18:24:27 Bitcoin really doesn't 18:24:33 Heh, unless we're talking about lego of gold-smelting and coin-minting ;) 18:25:04 lysobit; any kid with a PC can grab some kind of bitcoin library or client if he's interested 18:25:07 learn basic programming 18:25:09 and build cool shit with it 18:25:17 even if just for experimentation 18:25:32 some examples of that would be the bitcoin tipping bot 18:25:34 (on reddit) 18:25:42 the colored coins principle (which is a bit more advanced) 18:25:43 and so on 18:26:09 it's pretty much programming with money (or, in this perspective, tokens) 18:26:10 http://img3.etsystatic.com/000/0/5343173/il_fullxfull.217567195.jpg? 18:26:15 also 18:26:26 that sounds like a potentially dangerous idea 18:26:31 why? 18:26:42 because if the kid doesn't secure his shit 18:26:47 or has some security hole 18:26:51 all his bitcoins = gone 18:26:54 for ever 18:27:03 unlike say, playing with paypal api 18:27:12 You don't give kid all your btc fortunes 18:27:14 if the kid doesn't remove his lego structure from the living room, someone will step on it and destroy it 18:27:18 just look at the linode hack 18:27:20 lysobit: you are aware of the existence of a testnet? 18:27:24 no 18:27:27 go read up on it :) 18:27:32 And it's damn great learning xp actually 18:27:33 actually, I am 18:27:38 it's an entire parallel blockchain for the purpose of developing stuff 18:27:39 I thought you meant a bitcoin-specific one 18:27:40 and messing about 18:27:42 and experimenting 18:27:42 yes 18:27:44 bitcoin testnet 18:28:04 joepie91, Huh, I thought you meant btc proper 18:28:07 bitcoin testnet is a sandbox 18:28:11 MK_FG; that IS what I meant 18:28:16 it's not going to appeal to a kid if he can't use it in the real world 18:28:17 it's just that there's the testnet if you're afraid of losing shit 18:28:21 Like, kids selling lemonade on the net for btc instead of cash ;) 18:28:22 during experimenting 18:28:33 * joepie91 sighs 18:28:39 lysobit; that is what I am trying to point out 18:28:51 the testnet is just an alternate blockchain 18:29:01 when you dev something for testnet, it also works on main net 18:29:02 the testnet is not the "real world" 18:29:05 oh? 18:29:10 no, I mean 18:29:12 it just doesn't carry over the BTC 18:29:14 I am not finished yet 18:29:28 if you want to mess about with the technology, then you can freely do so on the testnet 18:29:31 without any risk whatsoever 18:29:41 if at any point you decide you want to use it 'in the real world' you can transition over 18:29:45 with pretty much one line of code changed 18:29:52 that introduces the usual risks and rewards 18:30:02 we're talking about kids here 18:30:17 if as a kid you mess about with banknotes and chemicals (which some kids certainly do) there's also the chance you're going to destroy your money 18:30:30 we're talking about kids interested in technology/science here 18:30:35 Or rather some bully will take them from you 18:30:40 MK_FG: or that 18:30:50 lysobit: all these risks are not unique to Bitcoin 18:31:09 they're not, but when using other technologies the risks are much, much smaller 18:31:23 for example, with the PayPal API there is no 'wallet.dat' to steal 18:31:30 if your wallet is taken 18:31:34 your money is gone forever 18:31:35 also 18:31:49 also http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1m0tje/bitcoin_should_market_to_kids/cc4qp34 18:32:00 for example, with the PayPal API there is no 'wallet.dat' to steal 18:32:03 that is bullshit 18:32:10 there are API keys to steal 18:32:12 with paypal, there's your account to steal 18:32:13 which happens 18:32:20 right 18:32:21 if you just want to mess about with an API, then use coinbase 18:32:24 or blockchain 18:32:25 but the risks are much smaller 18:32:26 or something similar 18:32:30 ... 18:32:30 if your paypal account is taken 18:32:33 no, they're not 18:32:34 they're identical 18:32:37 err no 18:32:42 you do realise 18:32:45 paypal is a CA 18:32:45 have you ever tried recovering a stolen account from paypal? 18:32:53 let me know how that goes 18:33:03 Kids aren't allowed to mess with paypal anyway, you can only give them cash 18:33:06 I haven't 18:33:22 lysobit: I know a bunch of people that have, and suffice to say it wasn't terribly successful 18:33:23 but the risks are certainly not 'identica;' 18:33:41 "yeah here you have your account back... oh, the money in it? yeah well, your account security is your responsibility, you're shit out of luck" 18:33:49 lysobit: they are 18:33:59 you want to play with a harmless API, go to coinbase/blockchain/whatever 18:34:03 with paypal there is a chance of getting your stuff back 18:34:07 you want to play with fake coins, use testnet 18:34:08 even if it's slim 18:34:10 ... 18:34:11 as you think it is 18:34:15 lysobit: as there is with Bitcoin 18:34:33 realistically? 18:34:41 realistically, but slim. 18:34:43 just like with paypal. 18:34:43 what are you going to do? hack your bitcoins back? 18:34:55 or is there some other way? 18:34:57 that I'm missing 18:35:14 anyway 18:35:19 I'm all for kids learning code, and such 18:35:24 transfer away your BTC before the thief gets the chance? cooperate with police and exchanges to intercept them? 'hack back' whoever stole it? 18:35:25 plenty of choices 18:35:43 as I said, realistically, but slim, just like with paypal 18:36:19 and I'm really not quite sure why you're comparing paypal and bitcoin, rather than paypal and coinbase/blockchain/whatever 18:36:41 well, we could argue all day about the chances of getting your stuff back with paypal or bitcoin, but I still maintain than paypal is much less risky 18:36:47 if someone gets your API key 18:36:53 they're not inside your account 18:36:59 they can just transfer shit 18:37:14 bt 18:37:14 btw 18:37:43 Teaching kids how to program bitcoin apps seems a bit of a sombre thing to do to get them into tech 18:38:21 I'm all for teaching them about how to use bitcoin in general though, how to sell stuff with bitcoin or whatnot 18:39:27 if someone gets your API key 18:39:28 again 18:39:29 coinbase 18:39:30 blockchain 18:39:36 I already said this... 4 times now? 18:40:17 right 18:40:23 I'm not familiar with these things 18:40:26 but after googling them 18:41:11 If you're going to teach kids to use those, aren't you basically teaching them how to program with the coinbase etc API, not the actual bitcoin protocol? 18:41:37 lysobit: exactly. just like paypal. 18:41:55 the comparison with paypal was your idea, so there you go 18:42:14 What I'm comparing here, is Bitcoin VS. APIs, like PayPal/coinbase/whatever 18:42:23 plus 18:42:43 I thought the original idea was to teach kids how to use bitcoin 18:42:45 not some api 18:43:02 for a 3rd party 18:43:07 that manages your bitcoins for you 18:43:17 that sort of defeats the purpose of bitcoins 18:45:00 lysobit: exactly. 18:45:19 hence the possibility of using either testnet - risk-free - or real net - with the associated risks and rewards 18:45:38 just like the lego building that your mom crushed by stepping on it because you left it in the middle of the living room floor 18:45:46 that you spent so much time on to build 18:46:00 the reward is that you get to show it to your parents, the risk is that they might overlook it and destroy it 18:46:08 which honestly is all a part of it 18:46:39 the problem with that comparison 18:46:48 is that lego is for playing 18:46:51 bitcoin is srs bsns 18:46:59 it's like 18:47:47 you wouldn't use that comparison if the legos were actually money, and they were building stuff with golden legos 18:47:56 and the risk is that their legos get stolen 18:48:26 which happens in irl alot too ofc 18:48:33 with actual money 18:49:24 is that lego is for playing 18:49:24 bitcoin is srs bsns 18:49:25 no, not really 18:49:37 lysobit, So you won't buy your kid a smartphone or psp 18:49:41 if you play with $5 of BTC then that's not any more 'serious' than your $5 bin of legos 18:50:07 (and probably a hell of a lot of a better investment than most of the other "e-currencies" that parents spend money on for their kids, but that aside) 18:50:16 MK_FG: I would, but my point here is not that the risk is too high (though I've argued above that it is), but lego vs bitcoin is not a good comparison 18:50:37 who am I kidding, no such thing as $5 bin of legos 18:50:44 lol 18:50:45 that'll probably get you 30 bricks or something 18:50:46 lol 18:52:17 joepie91 I can understand that if they're just buying/selling with bitcoins 18:52:30 but realistically what sort of bitcoin apps are they going to be programming? 18:52:39 mining pools? 18:52:49 currency exchangers like mtgox? 18:52:53 who knows? that's kind of the whole point 18:52:55 payment apis? 18:52:56 lol 18:53:04 currency exchangers, certainly not 18:53:10 that's the thing 18:53:17 I can't think of a "lighthearted" thing that could be made 18:53:20 probably no payment APIs either (they still have parents that will tell them "no you can't do that" you know) 18:53:25 lysobit: I gave you two examples 18:53:42 very early on in this conversation 18:53:51 talking of 18:53:52 some examples of that would be the bitcoin tipping bot 18:53:52 (on reddit) 18:53:52 the colored coins principle (which is a bit more advanced) 18:53:52 and so on 18:53:53 BTCs 18:54:02 they're still at $134 on MtGox 18:54:03 pft 18:54:11 and lysobit: mining pools, perhaps, but probably not a bog standard one - there's too many of those already 18:54:13 iceTwy: ignore mt gox 18:54:19 no, joe 18:54:23 joepie91* 18:54:34 bitcoin tipping bot isn't really lighthearted.. it's essentially a payment processor 18:54:39 and what is the colored coins principle? 18:54:39 for the simple reason that OTC/localbitcoins.com traders base their prices on MtGox's 18:54:56 so there's no ignoring MtGox when you get BTCs via OTC 18:54:57 lysobit: anything is a payment processor if it sends Bitcoins from A to B and you adhere tto that definition 18:55:00 so that's a moot point 18:55:05 iceTwy: they don't around here 18:55:11 around where 18:55:13 NL 18:55:20 herp 18:55:25 localbitcoins prices are usually under mt gox price 18:55:28 haven't checked OTC recently 18:55:29 at least the guys in #bitcoin-otc on Freenode do 18:55:32 but I'd imagine it to be similar 18:55:54 lysobit: google "bitcoin colored coins" 18:56:01 joepie91: it's not a moot point, my point is that any payment processor app is pretty serious, which is pretty much almost everything you can make 18:56:38 https://bitcoil.co.il/BitcoinX.pdf 18:56:50 lysobit: no, it's not 18:56:52 and no, it's not 18:57:12 in that case it's still not a moot point, but go ahead and finish 18:59:07 a 'payment processor app' is not automatically 'pretty serious' as you can pretty much infinitely divide Bitcoins into smaller pieces which means that the only measure of seriousness is how you use it 18:59:10 or how much you put into it 18:59:17 especially by your definition of 'payment processor' 18:59:20 right 18:59:21 which honestly isn't really compatible with Bitcoin 18:59:31 and it's not pretty much almost everything you can make 18:59:36 there's an entire damn scripting language in Bitcoin 18:59:45 for transactions 18:59:52 which is how shit like colored coins can be implemented 19:00:07 and multi-signature transactions 19:00:10 and a lot of other stuff 19:03:55 *** crytocc749 (crytocc749@cryto-D181503A.torservers.net) has joined #crytocc 19:04:28 a 'payment processor app' is not automatically 'pretty serious' as you can pretty much infinitely divide Bitcoins into smaller pieces which means that the only measure of seriousness is how you use it 19:04:57 ok so why not teach kids also how to use other payment technologies, like the PayPal API or debit card transactions? 19:05:14 would you, in theory, have a problem with that? 19:05:25 assuming that bitcoin is also taught 19:06:24 lysobit: because A. there are arbitrary restrictions by vendors B. you cannot pretty much infinitely divide the money used which leads to it becoming an unpredictable money sink C. you're causing vendor lock-in by teaching kids to work with proprietary platforms rather than an open/reusable/extensible protocol/concept 19:06:44 yes, I know that currently Bitcoins are divisible up to 8 decimals, this is not a hard limit and can be changed 19:08:39 Why would you want to make a payment processor app where only an insanely small amount of bitcoins are transferred? I don't see how the fact that bitcoins are infinitely divisible automatically means it's a predictable money sink. 19:11:01 that they are infinitely divisible is why it's *not* a predictable money sink 19:11:05 er 19:11:07 unpredictable 19:11:34 if something goes wrong during experimentation and you lose half your BTC you just lower the amount you mess around with 19:11:49 lysobit: I get the idea that you're confusing the two situations I'm sketching 19:12:09 one being "hey, let's mess around with this stuff and a bunch of (partial) BTC just to play around and experiment" 19:12:24 and the other being "hey let's build this thing that others can use and try to make it work really well" 19:12:33 they are very different situations 19:12:37 if you're just talking about experimentation, then vendor-based payment systems aren't a money sink either because their testnets have fake money 19:12:49 refer to point A and C 19:17:32 A and C are political points, which is a matter of opinion. In theory we should be teaching kids what is going to be the most useful to them in the real world today (debit cards, etc, which is basically the de-facto mainstream payment method) as well as new technologies like Bitcoins. Note I'm all for Bitcoin taking over the world, but you have to be unbiased despite how "open/reusable/extensible 19:17:33 protocol/concept" is better, if you're aiming to teach kids about how play with payment processing then perhaps Bitcoin isn't something that is going to directly benefit them in the mainstream world 19:18:17 It's a bit like the "should we teach creationism or evolution at school?" debate 19:18:55 except that all forms of payment are valid things to be taught at school 19:19:15 but I suppose it depends on what your idea of a "school" is. 19:20:14 *** crytocc749 has quit (User quit: Page closed) 19:24:08 "In theory we should be teaching kids what is going to be the most useful to them in the real world today" 19:24:11 no, we shouldn'tt 19:24:16 shouldn't* 19:24:17 I KNEW you were going to say that. 19:24:18 this is a recipe for disaster 19:24:19 I just KNEW it 19:24:20 lol 19:24:26 and hey, guess what, we are in disaster right now 19:24:58 but I suppose it depends on what your idea of a "school" is. 19:25:06 also 19:25:44 So you idea of a school it teach what is the _best_ system to use, in your opinion? 19:25:44 the only definition of "school" where I can see your remark fitting in is "institution that is dedicated to maintaining current principles and order, and preventing any changes of power or innovation" 19:25:49 which is a pretty depressing definition 19:25:59 it is a depressing definition 19:26:02 and hopefully one we can get rid of asap 19:26:12 but that is not really my definition 19:26:27 My ideal definition, would probably be: 19:26:32 lysobit: then I fail to see how your remark fits in, as that is exactly what "teaching what is most useful in the real world today" has as a result 19:26:52 then you misread a few words 19:27:00 I doubt that, but go ahead 19:27:04 A and C are political points, which is a matter of opinion. In theory we should be teaching kids what is going to be the most useful to them in the real world today (debit cards, etc, which is basically the de-facto mainstream payment method) as well as new technologies like Bitcoins. 19:27:14 anyway, let me finish 19:27:23 yes, I read that. 19:27:23 twice. 19:29:52 my idea of a school is an institution which a) prepares you for the real world b) teaches you the ideas that are the most accepted in the real world (otherwise are you going to argue that Greek Mythology should be taught over evolution, or a computer science course should only teach you a bunch of obscure programming language for obscure operating systems that are not going to be useful for 19:29:52 you in employment?) and c) teaches you the latest ideas, that are not yet as popular or fully implemented - such as in the case of a computer science course, quantum computing 19:30:14 c) is important otherwise technology just isn't going to evolve 19:30:31 and so is b) otherwise school will be pointless 19:30:47 though, arguable 19:32:08 one moment, I have a stray package manager that refuses to quit, will read in a sec 19:32:27 ah there 19:32:28 fixed it 19:33:09 b and c directly contradict each other 19:33:14 and in practice, focus is laid on b 19:33:17 and really not on c at all 19:33:26 however, often b is taught while masquerading as c 19:33:41 how do they contradict each other? I'm sugging both b and c should be taught 19:33:44 suggesting* 19:34:00 obviously not in the same module or whatever 19:34:07 because one basically argues for keeping the current perceptions intact while the other argues for moving on 19:34:16 you cannot do both 19:34:24 and focus is heavily on b 19:34:37 [20:34:09] because one basically argues for keeping the current perceptions intact while the other argues for moving on 19:34:37 [20:34:18] you cannot do both 19:34:40 which makes c not much more than some philosophical back-of-your-mind brainfarts 19:35:07 both aguments for the present and future should be taught 19:35:08 *** Summerfag6532 (coolstory@CF4976EA.D6CB46C6.D95AF0A6.IP) has joined #crytocc 19:35:46 in society there are always people pushing for the status quo to be kept, and people pushing for an evolution in one direction 19:36:20 the proposed future doesn't always win, and sometimes within good reason 19:37:37 and also 19:37:44 yes, the emphasis should be kept on b 19:37:47 until you're doing a PhD 19:37:51 where the emphasis will be on c 19:38:00 it depends on the purpose of your degree 19:39:54 you cannot do both | yes they can, otherwise what exactly are you proposing? only that (c) is taught? 19:40:49 I think we are fundamentally disagreeing about the purpose of school 19:41:02 well yes, quite a change in subjects 19:41:09 the purpose I see in it is education, the purpose you see in it appears to be 'fitting within current common society model' 19:41:34 again, no I don't 19:41:45 everything you are describing confirms the above 19:42:08 you are completely missing the parts where I am suggesting that new stuff should be taught 19:42:15 as well as old stuff 19:42:17 no, I am seeing those parts 19:42:22 the problem is that you're presenting them as hypotheticals 19:42:29 rather than as applicable knowledge 19:42:43 besides, how can students make an informed decision on the new stuff without seeing the old stuff 19:42:44 especially with statements like this 19:42:44 yes, the emphasis should be kept on b 19:42:44 until you're doing a PhD 19:43:05 it just drips of "you go learn how to fit in first, then you can try and think about complicated scientific things" 19:43:09 which is completely the wrong atttitude 19:43:10 attitude * 19:43:14 no 19:43:19 what I'm saying is 19:43:43 "you go learn how the existing stuff works, then you can go try and think about the new and untested stuff" 19:44:09 you can't do the latter successfully 19:44:12 without the former 19:44:33 it's not about revolution 19:44:36 it's about evolution 19:44:47 "you go learn how the existing stuff works, then you can go try and think about the new and untested stuff" 19:44:51 that... is basically what I just said 19:45:11 in a slightly less patronizing tone 19:45:54 right, I disagree with how you're interpreting it, but if that's how you what to interpret it... 19:45:57 want8 19:45:58 want* 19:45:58 lysobit: the problem with teaching people existing stuff is that it creates the perception that the existing stuff is automatically most important and relevant 19:46:05 which is complete bullshit 19:46:30 if you teach purely in hypotheticals - whatever is most practical/useful/etc. - then you'll automatically end up with the 'right' solutions to problems 19:46:37 whether that's existing solutions or not 19:46:41 are you actually suggesting that we _shouldn't_ be teaching existing stuff in school? 19:46:45 correct. 19:46:50 in factg 19:46:51 fact * 19:46:55 okay 19:46:56 I'd argue that we shouldn't be teaching at all. 19:47:05 but rather enable people to learn. 19:47:07 so when I go to a pre-school physics class 19:47:16 I should be learning all about high-powered lasers and quantum physics 19:47:22 lysobit: see above 19:49:30 but rather enable people to learn. 19:49:42 there's so many things about this statement I want to say that I don't know where to start 19:49:55 in an ideal world 19:50:24 okay, let's start with this: enabling people to learn what? 19:50:34 what they want/need to learn. 19:51:39 Describe to me a possible method that I could use on, let's say, a 5 year old to enable them to learn what "they want/need to learn". 19:52:02 it's a bit of a bootstrapping problem 19:53:17 how does a 5 year old know what he wants/need to learn without external inspiration or exposure, other than let's say, playing with games or toys all day and watching tv? 19:53:40 you could give him some books 19:54:11 but then again you're basically teaching him not what they "want/need to learn", but what you think is important 19:54:53 how does a 5 year old know what he wants/need to learn without external inspiration or exposure, other than let's say, playing with games or toys all day and watching tv? 19:54:57 what's the problem with that? 19:55:33 let me give you an actual example 19:55:42 that i saw on reddit one time 19:56:04 there was a thread about parents who don't send their kids to school, but simply allow them to explore what they want to learn themselves 19:56:31 there was one kid who was basically spending most of his time making halo mods 19:56:36 so my point is 19:56:45 kids are going to want to learn what they're already exposed to 19:56:47 and therefore 19:56:58 no one is going to want to learn about chemistry, biology or whatever anymore 19:57:07 unless they're exposed to it 19:57:16 and when you expose them to it, you're basically teaching them 19:57:36 lysobit: not identical to what I am talking about 19:57:57 lysobit: not identical to what I am talking about 19:58:03 I answered what's the problem with that? 19:58:10 but then what are you talking about? 19:58:14 yes, and in your answer you are making a whole lot of assumptions 19:58:23 such as the absence of other materials 19:58:32 which is exactly the case in the parent example you gave 19:58:51 that is an assumption yes, and a very valid one 19:58:58 ... no, it's not 19:59:04 what I am talking about is, as I said earlier, enabling kids to learn 19:59:08 which includes providing resources to do so 19:59:13 which is exactly why your assumption is invalid 19:59:28 20:59:10] which includes providing resources to do so 19:59:29 right 19:59:34 so you propose giving them a selection of books 19:59:38 and they read what they want? 19:59:45 no, that is not what I said nor implied 19:59:46 based on what they're interested in? 19:59:48 then tell me 19:59:51 what you're propsing 19:59:51 :P 20:00:00 the primary bit there that you added 20:00:02 how do you provide the resources? 20:00:03 is "selection of" 20:00:08 which is absolutely not what I am talking about 20:00:17 by making as many resources available as possible 20:00:26 whether that be books, an internet connection, toys, whatever 20:00:33 a musical instrument 20:00:34 a games console 20:00:35 [20:51:40] Describe to me a possible method that I could use on, let's say, a 5 year old to enable them to learn what "they want/need to learn". 20:00:39 anything 20:00:48 providing resources 20:00:51 as I already said 20:00:56 I'm not sure what part of this is unclear to you 20:01:02 ok 20:01:04 or what issue you are seeing 20:01:20 you still haven't answered the question 20:01:23 or statement, for that matter 20:01:29 "providing resources" is not a method 20:01:40 you need to expand on that 20:01:45 uh, yes, it is 20:01:48 ok 20:01:49 there is nothing to expand on 20:01:51 then by that 20:01:52 provide whatever resources you can 20:01:53 have a read here: http://www.nncc.org/Child.Dev/ages.stages.5y.html 20:02:00 I'm going to make a whooole lot of assumptions 20:02:13 note the significant presence of things like 'toys' in that list 20:02:27 so I really do not see the problem with 20:02:29 how does a 5 year old know what he wants/need to learn without external inspiration or exposure, other than let's say, playing with games or toys all day and watching tv? 20:02:37 because that appears to be exactly what the developmental stage is like 20:04:11 I can't really continue until you expand on "provide resources". That link above doesn't tell me how to provide any resources 20:04:22 lysobit: what part is unclear? 20:04:32 In the link? 20:04:35 or your argument? 20:04:48 in the 'provide resources' bit 20:05:14 It's not a method. By provide resources I could assume you mean: 20:05:33 - give them a selection of books (which is apparantly not what you mean) 20:05:46 - give them access to the internet and let them explore whatever they want 20:05:50 - ??? 20:06:37 I already gave you a bunch of examples 20:06:49 which is absolutely not what I am talking about 20:06:50 by making as many resources available as possible 20:06:50 whether that be books, an internet connection, toys, whatever 20:06:50 a musical instrument 20:06:50 a games console 20:06:50 anything 20:06:50 providing resources 20:07:01 okay 20:07:04 so all of these things 20:07:04 anything that could conceivably be useful in learning things 20:07:14 including a "selection of books" 20:07:22 basically as many resources as you can give them? 20:07:36 pretty much, yes/ 20:07:38 .* 20:08:30 then I don't think you understand how kids work 20:08:46 because? 20:09:21 kids value play over other types of learning 20:09:28 if you provide them a selection of say, 20:09:48 a games console, a musical instrument, and a bunch of books about quantum physics 20:09:57 what is the kid going to pick? 20:10:07 this is where teaching is useful, because it turns learning into play 20:10:31 let's assume - note the use of the word 'assume' there - that the kid is going to pick 'games console', as you seem to be implying 20:10:32 so what? 20:10:32 note that reading a book is not play-based learning 20:11:00 you seriously don't see the problem with that? 20:11:03 ok: 20:11:27 let's suppose I have a kid called, I dunno Bob 20:12:13 Bob could be a future genius physicist that somehow solves world hunger 20:13:02 (cayce: see https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=argure.nl - "BEAST attack No longer rated; considered sufficiently mitigated client-side") 20:13:36 but nope, he's just going to be a halo mod creater for the rest of his life because was no "play-based learning" on physics, or anyone teaching him physics 20:13:42 now my point is 20:13:43 by doing that 20:14:06 you're not unlocking people's potential (not that school doesn't do this either, but this is worse) 20:14:16 people's full potential* that is 20:14:39 lysobit: and exactly what are you basing this reasoning on? 20:14:44 because you just seem to be sketching a doom scenario now 20:14:48 which part of the reasoning? 20:15:06 it's an extreme example, yes. 20:15:12 yet not explaining why A. Bob wasn't interested in physics to begin with B. he was able to spend a whole life (!!!!) on creating halo mods 20:15:21 because 20:16:05 "Bob wasn't interested in physics to begin with" 20:16:16 Tell me an example where the source of the interest might come from 20:16:26 and I'll continue 20:16:33 uhm, from the society he's living in? 20:16:38 no 20:16:40 I said give me an example 20:16:47 that is the example 20:16:49 no 20:16:51 it's not 20:16:53 why do I know about Bitcoin when I was never taught about it in school? 20:16:54 I mean 20:16:58 yes, it is 20:17:08 I can make a list of possible sources but that would be madness 20:17:15 people - and yes, also kids - constantly pick up things from their environment 20:17:22 whether that is their living room or a random website doesn't matter even a shred 20:17:22 yes 20:17:23 exactly 20:17:25 give me 1 source 20:17:32 people - and yes, also kids - constantly pick up things from their environment 20:17:34 "a website" 20:17:35 happy now? 20:17:41 ok 20:17:53 what type of website? 20:18:07 and why might the child be on that website? 20:18:16 because that's how the internet works? 20:18:21 wat 20:18:23 or rather 20:18:23 the web 20:18:33 the whole damn concept of the www is to link together various websites 20:18:38 so that you can end up on previously unknown websites 20:18:39 through other websites 20:18:45 you understand this perfectly well 20:18:51 so I'm curious why you're even asking this 20:18:56 as it doesn't even seem relevant to the original point anymore 20:19:01 it is relevant 20:19:03 you'll see 20:19:06 just answer my questions 20:19:16 what type of website might this be? 20:19:35 lysobit: I have a feeling you are fishing for an example that you can make an individual case against without it being relevant to the point of "discovering from environment" 20:19:54 it doesn't matter 20:20:00 fill in anything for your own question 20:20:16 sight 20:20:23 let me skip to the point I was going to make then 20:20:39 by all means do so. 20:28:43 Kids favour certain types of activities than others, because that's how human development work. Generally most kids favour the same type of activity - play, because that is the most effective way for a young human being to learn, for some reason due to evolution. If a kid is simply fulfilling the desire to do this activity, and even if you've given him all the resources in the world to look 20:28:44 at, it is less likely for a child to happen to stumble upon something which piques his interest in something intellectual like physics or, I dunno, stem cell research. That is because in general, "play" activities are about social learning rather than academic learning. You could argue that there are certain play activities that could be introduced that are crafted to pique their interest 20:28:44 in something more academic - but that is what teaching at a younger level is. (Note: I am using the word "academic" loosely here, to refer to any subject that is non-social.) 20:29:30 anyway 20:29:35 I really need to eat 20:30:00 lysobit: I think you'll find that even in the current school system, physics are not introduced until a later point in development 20:30:06 which is a point where play is not automatically prefered 20:30:37 yes, in early school stages numeracy and language is taught first 20:30:49 through "play" 20:30:50 (and hey, perhaps physics should be introduced in a more playful manner! see also mathematicians lament) 20:31:10 lysobit: also 20:31:23 there is one thing that I have intentionally not mentioned 20:31:26 throughout this entire discussion 20:31:35 and that is that a school model as I described already exists 20:31:40 and is applied successfull 20:31:42 successfully * 20:35:11 well, I'm going to dinner now 20:35:44 but give me a link to this "school" or whatever and I'll see when I get back later 20:36:36 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awOAmTaZ4XI 21:39:35 *** Amnesthesia has quit (Broken pipe) 21:40:10 *** joepie91 has quit (Ping timeout) 21:41:05 *** joepie91 (joepie91@cryto-3E6002EF.direct-adsl.nl) has joined #crytocc 22:03:13 *** iceTwy has quit (Input/output error)