00:05:04 *** T0R_till (T0R_till@cryto-F2D71A17.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com) has joined #crytocc 00:06:25 *** T0R_till has quit (User quit: Connection closed) 00:18:09 complex: I'm ashamed of myself; never learned to play chess 00:20:55 happens that one dude in norway is fighting to win the world championship in chess at the moment. he got remis with gary kasparov when he was 13 and all the biggest newspapers are streaming his matches live now. its very cool that norway as a nation such a big interest in a genius and child prodigy 00:26:54 *** complex has quit (Input/output error) 00:28:10 *** pzuraq has quit (Connection reset by peer) 00:28:32 *** pzuraq (pzuraq@cryto-D2623541.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #crytocc 00:34:25 .bitcoin 00:34:26 1 BTC = $438.00, 1 BTC = €344.88 00:34:41 holy fuck why didn't I invest when it was $100 each 00:35:00 why didn't I invest when it was $5 each 00:35:09 you guys think they'll keep going up? 00:35:39 who knows at this point 00:35:45 just enjoy the roller coaster ride 00:36:12 If I had any Bitcoins I would :/ I'm just watching 00:36:23 and it seems like a lot of fun 00:39:00 pzuraq: http://falkvinge.net/2013/03/06/the-target-value-for-bitcoin-is-not-some-50-or-100-it-is-100000-to-1000000/ 00:40:49 *** iceTwy has quit (Ping timeout) 00:41:00 *** iceTwy (iceTwy@cryto-610769D0.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #crytocc 00:49:31 makes sense, as the number of bitcoins is stable and they are infinitely subdivisible 00:51:19 I think Imma boy a couple bitcoins 00:51:22 buy* 00:52:08 joepie91: You read this? https://medium.com/ladybits-on-medium/d23a0d2f7697 00:52:15 amazing article 01:03:25 mm.. 01:07:18 the term "context collapse" is just brilliant to me 01:07:50 it explains SO much of the 21st century's issues 02:13:13 *** iceTwy has quit (User quit: Disconnecting from server) 02:24:41 *** mikaa has quit (Ping timeout) 02:25:00 *** mikaa (mikaa@mikaa.cryto.net) has joined #crytocc 02:34:30 *** Thor (numz@cryto-B3488B81.dfri.se) has joined #crytocc 02:35:11 http://cryto.net/destructomatch/ 02:35:20 long-standing game over bug finally fixed :D 02:46:03 pzuraq:) :D I love quinn's writings :> 02:46:44 j'ai retourné :D 02:59:01 joepie91:) you should shame dynadot >_> 02:59:10 cayce: oh, absolutely 03:01:18 I'm waiting to see which jurisdiction makes themselves most adversarial with US law so I can buy a domain there and pay for email 03:01:19 heh 03:05:46 cayce: This is the first I've read from her, but it is refreshingly insughtful 03:05:53 insightful* 03:06:13 ahh, I've been reading her stuff when I can find it for a couple years now 03:06:30 always fun, and usually smart (not smart like intelligent, smart like on-point) 03:09:38 indeed. Also pretty intelligent in this case, this article blew my mind. 03:09:59 Also, I'm getting into Twitter wore finally, starting to see how it workss 03:10:15 think it's my favorite social network now 03:10:25 :) 03:10:34 "Welcome to the flock" ;) 03:12:03 it's great 03:12:09 public text messaging 03:12:20 yup 03:12:32 I love it because it's almost flat, socially 03:12:53 I can yell at idiots and dignitaries in the same tweet 03:13:11 (he he heh, not necessarily different people) 03:13:45 at first I didn't see the utility, but as time goes on it makes more and more sense. There's a lot less danger in giving out a public text address than a phone number, so to speak, because people realize that their twitter account is being watched by a lot more people 03:14:16 da 03:14:32 I give out a nick, an email, and my twitter handle on my business cards. nothing else 03:14:36 sure, some people troll behind the veil of anonymity, but it's still less likely to provoke harassment than publishing a phone number on 4chan 03:14:54 good shit, think I'll start doing that :) 03:15:06 well, website, email, twitter handle 03:15:12 (the nick most associated with my legal name, to be exact) 03:15:20 yeah 03:15:21 same 03:15:24 website is in your email 03:15:24 :P 03:15:34 ah good point 03:15:40 (cleverly disguised) 03:15:40 this handle is basically my internet presence 03:15:47 search it on google, all me 03:15:51 yep 03:16:24 I need a more anon nick, planning on decoupling it from myself by connecting to services with it only through a VPN 03:16:34 * cayce nods 03:16:52 I just use random names wherever I want a little separation 03:17:00 it's not real separation, and I don't enforce it, but it's one more hurdle 03:17:25 it's an idiot barrier, not a hurdle to a real adversary 03:17:35 lol 03:17:36 truth 03:17:50 I would like a way to be completely anon though 03:17:56 * cayce nods 03:18:14 that's hard, given the way people/sites can store so much info about your computer now 03:18:25 when I get a new pc in a year or three I'm going to have some shit set up for that 03:18:49 get a VPN client, then set it up so that some scripts run whenever you connect through the VPN 03:18:57 but by that time hopefully I'll have an income 03:19:03 if I have an income, I'll be meshing 03:19:04 :) 03:19:38 scripts would work connect all your clients/services to alternative accounts that are only used through the VPN 03:19:53 * cayce nods 03:19:58 so twitter app switches accounts, IRC, jabber, etc 03:20:20 if you could do a bit more, such as switch primary browser, that would be ideal 03:20:32 * cayce nods 03:20:33 use firefox instead of chrome ;) 03:20:52 lmao :) 03:21:00 I switch between em as it is 03:22:30 now here's a question 03:23:02 can someone tell you are connecting to a given machine when you connect to a VPN? Likewise for SSH and SFTP? 03:23:14 hmm? 03:23:24 If so they can link you to that machine, then link your alternate persona to you 03:23:24 like, can your vpn session be seen? 03:23:40 if there are billing details involved, the answer will always be yes 03:23:58 moreso can data be seen traveling between you and that server? 03:24:25 well, it's traffic, so yes 03:24:34 hmm :/ 03:24:42 optimistically it can't be decrypted, but the traffic can be seen 03:24:56 that's a fatal flaw in the whole setup 03:24:57 I'd want to check on openvpn about which ciphers it can use 03:25:10 cause iirc it used to only support the ones with flaws 03:25:45 yeah, i'm assuming the data can't be decrypted. If it can we are in a whole different ballpark. 03:25:54 And I'm sure much of it can. 03:26:13 then yeah, just like any packet flow, a sufficiently knowledgeable adversary can see it (see: intelligence agencies) 03:26:59 ok, so how could you disconnect yourself from the alternate you (from now on, persona) as much as possible? 03:27:11 one idea is to spread blame 03:27:17 optimistically assuming it can't be decrypted, packets can always be seen travelling from pc to vpn terminator, and out. just like tor, if the traffic isn't encrypted going out it can be seen by anyone 03:27:48 building a persona is a different thing, but that's what you'd do 03:27:56 also, tor is good there 03:28:03 I forget, I think you tor into the vpn 03:28:14 (so the vpn tunnel runs over tor) 03:28:29 how does tor work? 03:28:35 ha ha go read the docs 03:29:02 fair unough :p 03:29:10 maybe that's the piece I'm missing 03:29:23 it's a big long thing, but essentially your shit is encrypted inside tor (still vulnerable at the exit node), and what you get is source disattribution 03:29:56 which is to say, your exit node probably can't tell where you are (assuming data stream is encrypted) 03:30:17 mmk 03:30:47 this helps, again, but I feel it still can be traceable if one were to create a full alternate persona 03:30:49 (the encryption keeps them from knowing WHO you are. it's no less important here) 03:30:55 probably 03:31:04 if your threat model is the NSA, you're probably boned for that 03:31:06 so it would be best to instead have many different micropersona's 03:31:13 one for each service 03:31:16 lol 03:31:29 but if you have a different threat model, you would mitigate the issues it presents 03:31:30 lol 03:31:41 (important: have a threat model) 03:32:26 my threat model is whatever the greatest possible threat is :P so it's the NSA, not because I particularly want to hide from them so much as because I want to find an impermeable way to remain anonymous 03:32:36 cause I like solving hard problems :) 03:33:59 bon chance, then lol 03:34:15 that problem is why people are building internet alternatives right now 03:34:16 lol 03:34:26 current system doesn't do that, and wasn't ever meant to 03:39:22 true I guess 03:39:34 still it's nice to push the limit 03:39:56 what is are the most promising alternatives that are being proposed? 03:43:21 I dunno, the only one I'm involved with at all is cjdns. stuff within tor is pretty good, but tor itself suffers from some centralization problems 03:54:52 ooh 03:54:56 interesting 03:55:25 IPv6 has had me very worried as it will take away a huge amount of anonymity 03:59:08 it doesn't really change anonymity 03:59:13 there's none in ipv4, so it can't get worse 03:59:34 but it does make it much easier to build distributed systems (no NAT, so no ICE just to fucking connect) 04:00:09 well, hypothetically in IPv4 if you are connected to subnet you can claim it was someone else on the network, or that someone connected and used your network without your knowledge 04:00:23 with IPv6, each machine would have a unique identity 04:00:42 well sure, but that doesn't actually stand up in court in most jurisdictions 04:00:48 ah 04:00:51 and yes, indeed 04:00:57 the difference between those two scenarios is NAT 04:01:00 which is satan 04:01:18 lol 04:01:25 that and ipv4 has run out of addresses already 04:01:30 so, uh, next version GO 04:01:54 but anyway, the way you gain anonymity is through routing hoops like tor 04:01:57 technically infinite addresses with subnetting 04:01:59 go read about it, if you haven't 04:02:00 but yeah 04:02:15 it's no silver bullet, of course 04:02:20 but every little bit helps 04:02:53 mm 04:03:04 TOR is definitely geed 04:03:10 but it's still leaves a trail 04:03:19 not gonna get away from that 04:03:29 not on the current net anyways 04:03:50 rewrite tho protocol, *maybe* you could make it part of the inherent structure 04:03:52 the* 04:04:02 you'd have to redo the hardware at this point 04:04:07 whole fuckin' thing 04:04:15 cause a different protocol is going to use ip 04:04:30 tbh I'm kinda in the opposite camp though 04:04:32 it just won't be udp or tcp, but it'll still run over ip something, at some level 04:04:51 with cjdns and similar, you can make local nets 04:04:58 that is, I think all interaction in the public sphere should be transparent 04:05:07 I saw articles about people making them in greece, there's a complete alternet there with 2500 dau 04:05:12 pretty much anything leaving the house 04:05:38 meh, I'd like to push those lines back a bit 04:05:43 house is too close 04:05:45 *** joepie91 has quit (Ping timeout) 04:05:52 house is pretty small, and easily ceded 04:05:55 mmk, maybe further than that 04:06:05 cause like 04:06:13 but my point is complete transparency of information 04:06:18 for ALL people 04:06:26 govts and corps included 04:06:28 I'm not one of the people who needs anonymity. I'm the most privileged class on earth, so I'mma use that to make sure people who need help get it 04:06:46 so I support none of this real names bullshit, source attribution bullshit, etc 04:06:49 none of it is needed 04:07:03 most of it actively harms people 04:07:10 currently, yes 04:07:16 but what if it were a two way street 04:07:38 then, no one can use personal information as leverage, because it's already public 04:07:50 I would accept that end only in a case where societies were prepared to actually make it a two way street 04:07:55 I can't see that outcome happening 04:07:58 agreed 04:08:02 so I'll not even pursue it 04:08:05 at least not currently 04:08:26 well, I wanted to discuss it because I'm not sure if that is the best option or not 04:08:27 but just as it is, transsexual people who haven't come out to families, for eg, are in danger 04:08:41 situations like that would have to be completely resolved before I'd even consider militant transparency 04:09:16 we can't even apply "human rights" reasonably most of the time, so that's a long fucking ways off yet 04:09:18 oh absolutely 04:09:34 I'm talking like Star Trek future 04:09:52 well that's basically what they do 04:09:53 we all love each other and nobody beats people for being different 04:10:16 Star Trek? 04:10:25 I'm more pragmatic than idealist, so I don't often look at those 04:10:27 yes 04:10:45 my frame is always "what is feasible in my lifetime" 04:10:51 ah 04:10:56 "what can I improve for my children?" 04:11:14 which is important, because it keeps you not stuck in this stupid "what am I doing tomorrow" shit that fucks everyone 04:11:26 lol 04:11:43 well, I have been tending to think that way moreso in the past few years, but I still like to discuss the ideal 04:11:46 like, I have a 5 and 10 year plan 04:12:25 because I think that eventually in our lifetime or not, we will be able to approach the ideal. 04:13:09 So to figure out what to do in this lifetime, I ask "what can I do that will change the world now, AND bring us closer to the/one of the ideal outcomes" 04:13:15 I don't aspire to an ideal, I aspire to a pareto optimized reality 04:13:41 which can be achieved via incremental change 04:14:02 small changes help, but thousands of small changes in many areas help more 04:14:13 I would say that my definition of "ideal" is similar to Pareto optimization 04:14:20 apply harm reduction methods to making the world better 04:14:36 I would argue there is the potential for false peaks though 04:14:38 and optimize first steps to be least effort for highest gain 04:15:31 that way you get larger effects at the front 04:15:38 cayce: We should discuss this more, liking this convo 04:15:42 gotta run though 04:15:43 yus 04:15:45 same here 04:15:47 I want ice cream 04:15:50 and it's 1.5 miles away 04:15:56 * cayce bike bike bike 04:15:59 good luck 04:16:05 da you too 04:16:07 later 04:17:00 *** Thor has quit (Input/output error) 04:25:10 *** pzuraq has quit (Input/output error) 04:37:55 *** Zekka has quit (Ping timeout) 04:38:18 *** Zekka (zekka@cryto-51547254.ph.ph.cox.net) has joined #crytocc 04:55:27 *** Charles (Charles@1C8DD76D.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 04:57:22 *** pzuraq (pzuraq@cryto-D2623541.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #crytocc 05:04:37 *** Charles has quit (Client exited) 05:04:59 *** Charles (Charles@1C8DD76D.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 05:19:26 *** Charles has quit (Client exited) 06:10:55 *** Charles (Charles@1C8DD76D.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 06:21:33 *** Charles has quit (Client exited) 06:24:58 *** Charles (Charles@1C8DD76D.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 06:38:02 *** Charles has quit (Ping timeout) 07:04:36 .bitcoin 07:04:37 1 BTC = $454.01, 1 BTC = €360.00 07:47:19 *** Charles (Charles@4FEB6926.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 08:01:21 *** Charles has quit (Client exited) 08:03:31 *** Charles (Charles@4FEB6926.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 08:05:05 *** fanat1ck (fanat1ck@cryto-2F514EC7.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com) has joined #crytocc 08:06:27 *** fanat1ck has quit (User quit: Connection closed) 08:10:13 *** Charles has quit (Client exited) 08:10:39 *** pzuraq has quit (Connection reset by peer) 08:11:01 *** Charles (Charles@4FEB6926.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 08:11:01 *** pzuraq (pzuraq@cryto-D2623541.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #crytocc 08:16:16 *** anonHS (anonHS@anonHS.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 08:21:18 *** GHOSTnew has quit (Ping timeout) 08:27:00 *** Charles has quit (Client exited) 08:27:10 *** Charles (Charles@4FEB6926.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 08:30:34 *** Charles_ (Charles@EE058133.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 08:31:04 *** Charles has quit (Ping timeout) 08:31:27 *** anonHS has parted #crytocc () 08:35:25 *** GHOSTnew (GHOSTnew@GHOSTnew.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 08:43:25 *** Charles_ has quit (Ping timeout) 08:44:55 *** Ari has quit (Connection reset by peer) 08:51:59 *** Charles_ (Charles@A7B4A5D0.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 09:16:26 *** Charles_ has quit (Client exited) 09:27:47 *** Charles_ (Charles@A7B4A5D0.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 09:35:12 *** Charles_ has quit (Ping timeout) 10:29:31 *** iceTwy (iceTwy@cryto-610769D0.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #crytocc 11:12:05 *** Charles_ (Charles@A7B4A5D0.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 11:46:19 *** ElectRo` has quit (Ping timeout) 11:46:34 *** ElectRo` (x@cryto-BFEA5E32.snydernet.net) has joined #crytocc 11:47:18 *** GHOSTnew has quit (Ping timeout) 11:47:18 *** probably has quit (Ping timeout) 11:47:28 *** probably (asdf@cryto-67AF6B55.torservers.net) has joined #crytocc 11:47:40 *** GHOSTnew (GHOSTnew@GHOSTnew.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 11:47:43 *** Charles_ has quit (User quit: Mango IRC for iOS and OS X, http://mediaware.sk/mango) 11:47:58 *** Charles (Charles@A7B4A5D0.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 12:01:40 .bitcoin 12:01:41 1 BTC = $470.00, 1 BTC = €379.62 12:01:57 it reached $500 on mt gox 12:13:07 *** Charles has quit (Ping timeout) 12:14:21 *** Charles (Charles@58DFB7E.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 12:18:16 \o/ 12:19:33 Or maybe /o\ 12:20:22 Probably more bad than good comes of such insanely fast growth 12:20:59 (assuming price is directly corellated with perceived legitimacy and usage) 12:22:11 The market capital increased from $4b to $5b in ~1 day! 12:22:13 https://blockchain.info/charts/market-cap 12:24:37 *** Charles has quit (User quit: Mango IRC for iOS and OS X, http://mediaware.sk/mango) 12:24:53 *** Charles_ (Charles@58DFB7E.95108C33.5B0695F1.IP) has joined #crytocc 12:25:10 *** Charles_ has quit (User quit: Mango IRC for iOS and OS X, http://mediaware.sk/mango) 12:25:31 *** Charles (Charles@Charles.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 12:30:13 hurry up and crash so I can buy more Bitcoins! :P 12:31:19 You greedy capitalist swine! 12:32:51 And they probably blow all that growth on Satoshi Dice anyway 12:33:14 yeah CMON CRASHH 12:33:28 i wish it wld dip to 300 12:33:38 :( too hopeful 12:34:08 Who knows, who knows 12:34:51 .title http://falkvinge.net/2013/03/06/the-target-value-for-bitcoin-is-not-some-50-or-100-it-is-100000-to-1000000/ 12:34:53 lysobit: The Target Value For Bitcoin Is Not Some $50 Or $100. It Is $100,000 To $1,000,000. - Falkvinge on Infopolicy 12:34:53 Iirc last time it skyrocketed I advised DrWhat to take mob money for great profits 12:35:00 That doesn't look right 12:35:05 Clearly he should've listened to great advice (tm) 12:35:14 If Bitcoin reaches $1m the market cap would be $22m 12:35:19 If Bitcoin reaches $1m the market cap would be $22 trillion * 12:35:23 (and it crashed like on the next day) 12:35:35 *** pzuraq has quit (Connection reset by peer) 12:35:52 *** pzuraq (pzuraq@cryto-D2623541.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #crytocc 12:35:57 lol 12:36:18 22 trillion is like world's count of legit fiat moneys or something? 12:36:33 Anyway, it's still possible if Bitcoin becomes truly mainstream 12:36:41 *** probably has quit (Client exited) 12:36:42 $22 trillion is only twice the size of the US economy 12:36:46 *** probably (asdf@cryto-5A768E90.torservers.net) has joined #crytocc 12:36:53 Oh, not that lot then, I guess 12:37:03 well, 1.5 times the size* 12:37:26 If that ever happens, then that marks the fall of the American empire 12:38:07 Oh noes, we'll have to find someone else to make fun of 12:38:14 "My prediction of a mainstream breakthrough around the year 2019 remains, and it still depends on getting mainstream usability; a target market cap may be reached about a decade after that happens, as a technology typically takes ten years from mainstream breakthrough to maturity." 12:38:54 I call bullshit on "technology typically takes ten years from mainstream breakthrough to maturity" 12:39:06 It very much depends on what kind of tech 12:39:18 And a lot of other factors, really 12:39:27 Nevertheless, if that prediction is true I will have $25m by the age of 34 12:39:42 but I somewhat doubt this 12:39:48 it seems to surreal 12:39:50 too* 12:39:53 Yeah, you'll be able to afford like 3 cheezburgers 12:40:06 Huzzah! 12:40:22 *** GHOSTnew has quit (Ping timeout) 12:42:02 "The total size of the transactional currency market is hard to estimate, but has been pegged at about $60 trillion (the amount of money in circulation worldwide). " 12:42:08 *** GHOSTnew (GHOSTnew@cryto-D74E7F4D.slact.net) has joined #crytocc 12:42:56 Wank wank wank 12:43:08 Go do something awesome already 12:43:08 lol 12:43:29 I am doing something awesome 12:51:06 *** Charles has quit (Client exited) 12:51:16 *** Charles (Charles@Charles.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 12:52:26 *** daemon has quit (Connection reset by peer) 12:52:37 *** daemon (daemon@CB03FA94.D4BF3E17.2F44BC5B.IP) has joined #crytocc 13:10:47 *** fr0z3n has quit (Input/output error) 13:11:06 *** fr0z3n (fr0z3n@cryto-D181503A.torservers.net) has joined #crytocc 13:19:51 *** Charles has quit (User quit: Mango IRC for iOS and OS X, http://mediaware.sk/mango) 13:19:51 *** Charles (Charles@Charles.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 13:25:51 *** joepie91 (joepie91@cryto-3E6002EF.direct-adsl.nl) has joined #crytocc 13:40:15 *** Charles has quit (Client exited) 13:48:53 *** Charles (Charles@Charles.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 13:53:52 *** Charles has quit (Ping timeout) 14:20:10 *** Charles (Charles@Charles.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 14:25:53 *** Charles has quit (Client exited) 14:26:39 *** Charles (Charles@Charles.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 14:58:23 *** Charles has parted #crytocc (None) 15:16:06 *** lysobit has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** probably has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** stanone has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** jimirus has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** connor has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** lblissett has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** staticsafe has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** joepie91 has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** daemon has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** pzuraq has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** cayce has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** Sonic has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** Sue has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** captainobvious has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** foolex has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** truetravesty has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** SpaghettiCode has quit (haless.cryto.net nexus.cryto.net) 15:16:06 *** d0wn has quit (Input/output error) 15:16:06 *** niveus has quit (Input/output error) 15:16:06 *** Asad has quit (Input/output error) 15:16:06 *** vld has quit (Input/output error) 15:16:06 *** ^Xires has quit (Input/output error) 15:16:06 *** escape has quit (Input/output error) 15:16:23 *** d0wn|off (d0wn_blog@cryto-256AD0BA.static.lu) has joined #crytocc 15:16:42 *** d0wn|off is now known as d0wn 15:16:57 *** MKFG (MK_FG@D8F8B70C.2AA32F40.3B131C16.IP) has joined #crytocc 15:17:10 *** IR602 (root@cryto-E0B662A7.abu.se.net) has joined #crytocc 15:17:27 *** Asad (Asad@cryto-87BB564D.hopped.co.uk) has joined #crytocc 15:17:41 *** zxcvbnm has quit (Ping timeout) 15:17:41 *** IR601 has quit (Ping timeout) 15:17:41 *** tintin has quit (Ping timeout) 15:17:41 *** Zekka has quit (Ping timeout) 15:17:41 *** MK_FG has quit (Ping timeout) 15:17:41 *** DrWhat has quit (Ping timeout) 15:17:41 *** IR602 is now known as IR601 15:17:41 *** MKFG is now known as MK_FG 15:18:44 *** niveus (niveus@cryto-53CDDE0F.servers.zerigo.net) has joined #crytocc 15:19:56 *** zxcvbnm (zxcvbnm@9F88BA40.33FD1BC3.D4256504.IP) has joined #crytocc 15:31:43 .. ? 15:31:48 *** iceTwy has quit (User quit: Disconnecting from server) 15:31:52 *** iceTwy (iceTwy@cryto-610769D0.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #crytocc 15:32:03 all hell broke loose on this server 15:32:06 damn 15:32:14 MK_FG isn't even opped anymore! 15:32:25 Yay! 15:32:33 FREEEEDOOOM!!!! 15:32:35 * iceTwy wrecks havoc in da channel 15:32:41 in other news 15:32:44 things are looking really good 15:33:06 currently setting up an arch linux repo with Bitcoin & Litecoin clients 15:33:18 and LTS Linux kernel with grsecurity & PaX patches 15:33:30 to be used for completely offline cold storage 15:36:40 grsec is teh awesomest 15:38:03 *** tintin (tintin@3DD1BC63.5145288.A27E456C.IP) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** vld (vld@vld.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** Zekka (zekka@Zekka.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** escape (tor@AA590F93.362B7402.283603DB.IP) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** joepie91 (joepie91@cryto-3E6002EF.direct-adsl.nl) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** daemon (daemon@CB03FA94.D4BF3E17.2F44BC5B.IP) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** probably (asdf@cryto-5A768E90.torservers.net) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** pzuraq (pzuraq@cryto-D2623541.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** stanone (Grep@stanone.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** cayce (cayce@cayce.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** jimirus (jimirus@jimirus.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** connor (c@BA2D26D0.339A30FF.B40044C0.IP) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** Sonic (Mcloven@cryto-9F42E372.static.internode.on.net) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** lblissett (lblissett@cryto-B07B90B6.tor-exit.calyxinstitute.org) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** Sue (sue@cryto-AC0C3F6A.hardestyhosting.com) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** lysobit (musalbas@localhost) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** staticsafe (ss@staticsafe.py) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** SpaghettiCode (pasta@code.bonanza) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** truetravesty (truetraves@7ABB88F7.2C566207.79E6D716.IP) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** foolex (foolex@5D6B0912.EC145393.9A74EEF1.IP) has joined #crytocc 15:38:03 *** captainobvious (groente@cryto-4DA48F8F.puscii.nl) has joined #crytocc 15:38:29 MK_FG: yeah 15:38:40 MK_FG: seriously, Arch makes everything less time-consuming 15:38:42 AUR packages 15:38:44 <3 15:39:05 all I've got to do is make my own repo with necessary packages (already done), then build a Live CD with the packages I want 15:39:08 using archiso 15:39:10 how is that not convenient and cool 15:40:09 No objections there 15:40:14 Carry on, sir 15:44:12 *** GHOSTnew has quit (Input/output error) 15:47:29 *** DrWhat (Snake@DrWhat.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 15:47:30 http://www.unknowncheats.me/forum/862209-post36.html 15:47:32 .title 15:47:33 DrWhat: UnKnoWnCheaTs - Multiplayer Game Hacks and Cheats - View Single Post - [Question] Bitcoin Donations 15:47:43 joepie91 ^ 15:47:47 Am i right? 15:47:54 anything i need to change/correct 15:48:18 *** GHOSTnew (GHOSTnew@GHOSTnew.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 15:49:28 DrWhat: that is an incredibly shitty font size 15:49:59 I actually had to zoom two notches to be able to read it comfortably, and I have pretty good eyesight 15:50:25 also, DrWhat, not sure what you mean with "civilian currency", might be the wrong word there 15:51:09 aside from that, your post isn't as well-written as it could've been :P 15:51:21 thats in design 15:51:22 :) 15:51:22 point 4 for example isn't answered very convincingly 15:51:26 like 15:51:34 you make a statement that fits into your understanding of BTC 15:51:59 but to somebody reading it without knowledge of BTC - without the knowledge you base that statement on - it reads like gibberish 15:52:12 (facedesk) 15:52:14 even if your statement(s) are technically correct, you're not effectively transfering the message 15:52:59 They aint points 15:53:03 they are replies 15:53:08 to points 15:53:14 that is an awfully familiar forum theme, by the way 15:53:21 DrWhat: no, they're counterpoints 15:53:30 to give an example 15:53:35 yeah 15:53:35 let's pretend I don't understand much about BTC 15:53:42 what do you mean with 'standalone currency'? 15:53:47 Oh boy :) RP 15:53:47 what does it have to do with my question about hassle? 15:53:58 how did I say it was a temp solution? 15:54:13 how does subway in russia accepting it, and an ATM existing in canada, help my usage of BTC? 15:54:16 what does that have to do with me? 15:54:26 why can't I just use BTC without getting an account? 15:54:45 and why can't you just send the money over paypal? 15:54:59 He Understands that part of bitcoin 15:55:08 DrWhat: you think he does 15:55:10 his post says otherwise 15:55:26 whats he doesnt understand how the BTC goes from on his pc to his pocket 15:55:49 try reading the whole thread, Mite open a bigger picture 15:55:50 http://www.unknowncheats.me/forum/forum-general/96183-bitcoin-donations.html 15:56:58 from thats thread alone and the discution in chat box 15:57:14 60% of the people who regularly post have BTC 15:57:16 DrWhat: but wouldn't accepting BTC donations just make the site look bad? 15:57:31 Hurr hurr 15:57:49 and why can't you just send money using PayPal? you don't need to create an account 15:58:12 Bitcoins are co complicated... 15:58:33 (DrWhat: note how I'm just rehashing the arguments in the forum thread here, from their point of view) 15:58:42 yup- 15:58:59 DrWhat: so, rebut them 16:03:01 The best quote from that thread is "Saying that Java is nice because it works on every OS is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on every gender." 16:06:20 lysobit: hahaha 16:07:00 I think this reasoning is perfectly valid, though 16:07:21 *** complex (litehode@complex.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 16:29:26 *** Cryto504 (Cryto504@cryto-83C1000D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #crytocc 16:32:18 *** Cryto504 has quit (User quit: Page closed) 16:50:24 http://i.imgur.com/Q8QMf4u.gif 16:51:02 seen it about 10 times already :p 16:52:14 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t65WaPxPa1s 17:05:07 *** THX1337b (THX1337b@cryto-235282EF.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com) has joined #crytocc 17:06:30 *** THX1337b has quit (User quit: Connection closed) 17:22:47 oo 17:22:49 sweet 17:22:59 looks like I'll have some Python X JSON related work 17:23:55 sounds exciting :D 17:24:01 lol 17:24:21 json = [root_obj][lesser][lesser][item] 17:25:26 which reminds me 17:25:42 gonna finish my keyword ranker over thanksgiving break 17:27:11 cayce: more complex than that 17:27:30 probably, I was just extracting values 17:27:31 it could become a handy tool for people using AUR 17:27:44 api call -> parse json -> extract number -> cast to int -> compare 17:27:56 yeah that 17:28:08 yep 17:28:13 I've never really messed with JSON in Python 17:28:23 it's not more complicated than the code I pasted 17:28:26 well, wrote 17:28:31 there might be quotes or something 17:28:31 lol 17:28:31 plus this is in Python3 because pacman python bindings are in python3 only 17:28:34 so herp 17:28:38 but anyway 17:28:41 yeah 17:28:51 you import json; and then parse the object 17:28:56 then you can access it like an array 17:28:57 done 17:29:08 it's really shit simple lol 17:29:51 my whole script was like 26 lines, and it pulled from an authenticated api, parsed, compared, and texted me via amazon's api 17:30:27 * cayce import boto; 17:30:35 or boto.* I think 17:30:39 so the names are less retarded 17:30:44 anyway 17:31:08 their python thing is like java, all the names are boto.name.othername.thing.fuckyou() 17:40:46 isn't boto that google thing? 17:44:08 looks like someone posted a comment on my HTML5 player article 17:44:10 "I'd like to get the older Flasher player back. This new HTML5 player is shit. I can't watch videos, full-screened on my primary monitor while doing stuff on my secondary monitor. Annoying as fuck." 17:44:14 ~ John 17:50:58 iceTwy:) https://github.com/boto/boto 18:30:24 is bitcoins surveillanced yet? 18:30:58 is it 100% safe to whitewash your money with it? 18:31:05 wups 18:31:15 i guess laundering is the correct word 18:31:23 cayce, In py you usually do someting like "from boto.name.othername.thing import fuckyou" anyway to waste less keystrokes 18:31:31 yeah 18:31:38 that's what I did, since I just needed SNS support 18:31:40 (though doesn't apply to *, which is way too confusing) 18:31:46 I kept the SNS part of the name 18:31:57 so I don't confuse where I'm calling 18:31:57 lol 18:32:18 is bitcoins surveillanced yet? 18:32:23 complex, btc is like most anti-laundering as you can get 18:32:25 this is a question you shouldn't even be asking 18:32:38 it is either technically guaranteed not to be, or it is assumed to be 18:32:50 huh 18:32:54 if it's anything aside from those two to you, you have a problem with your opsec 18:33:27 this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operations_security ? 18:33:33 * joepie91 sighs 18:33:40 :P 18:33:41 complex: either Bitcoin technically guarantees to be impossible to be surveilled, or it doesn't 18:33:50 if it doesn't, you should be assuming that it is surveilled 18:33:57 yes 18:33:58 asking whether it is surveilled "yet" means you're doing it wrong 18:34:05 the problem is with the "yet" 18:34:07 ok get it 18:34:11 is it surveillanced? 18:34:18 still the wrong question 18:34:28 you already make the assumption that it can be (apparently), so why are you asking whether it is? 18:34:34 if it can be surveilled, you should assume it to be 18:34:45 the proper question here is "can Bitcoin be surveilled" 18:34:56 im asking out of ignorance, in lack of knowledge about how bitcoins really works 18:35:04 but im starting to get used to nothing being secure 18:35:07 complex: this is not really related to Bitcoin 18:35:12 that's why I was refering to opsec 18:35:22 so opsec is what i was linking to? 18:35:27 yes 18:35:33 if something is not technically guaranteed to be secure/anonymous/whatever, you should assume that it isn't 18:35:49 In case of btc, there are nice papers tracking coins to/from major holders' hands 18:35:50 because trusting anything or anybody that is not a technical guarantee, is a massive risk 18:35:55 so bitcoin does not guarantee that? 18:35:57 Public ledger \o/ 18:36:00 ok 18:36:03 so regardless of whether it's Bitcoin or TOR or SSL or whatever else 18:36:07 you should only look at technical guarantees 18:36:14 not asking whether anybody is taking advantage of lack of them 18:36:44 now the answer to "can Bitcoins be surveilled" is that there is a public ledger that tracks what coins go from what address to what address 18:36:59 ok, so bitcoins is not secure in any ways and will never be 18:37:15 complex: I wasn't done yet, and you're jumping to conclusions 18:37:15 and it is not safe for laundering 18:37:26 those are vastly different questions 18:37:27 these are complex topics (no pun intended) 18:37:27 joepie91, See what you get with your logic!? 18:37:37 you shouldn't try to get an answer in less than a minute 18:37:43 because the reasoning behind it alone, takes more than that 18:37:51 bitcoin isn't simple lol, ask better questions 18:38:10 complex: asking "is Bitcoin secure/anonymous/whatever", to put it simply, isn't a question that you can give a yes or no to 18:38:11 cayce: ... 18:38:18 you need to actually understand the subject matter 18:38:25 and understand what the risks are 18:38:29 from this discussion, it is a certain no 18:38:39 complex: you're still jumping to conclusions 18:38:46 independent of whether it is secure or not 18:38:52 there IS no clear-cut answer to your question 18:38:58 so stop looking for one 18:38:59 :| 18:39:07 "secure" isn't a question. secure against what? 18:39:08 i know, which implies that "no, its not secure" 18:39:11 you haven't said 18:39:15 there is only an in-depth answer that involves a good understanding of the mechanics 18:39:19 complex: no, it doesn't 18:39:23 again 18:39:26 there is no clear-cut answer 18:39:28 stop looking for one 18:39:32 It's secure against double spending 18:39:38 stop trying to conclude "yes" or "no" from whatt I say 18:39:41 so, there it's secure 18:39:41 done 18:39:44 derp logic 18:39:46 and make the effort to actually discuss the topic and understand it 18:39:58 I was literally in the process of explaining to you what the caveats were 18:40:02 when you jumped to a conclusion 18:40:07 basically making it pointless for me to elaborate any further 18:40:15 because you'd already made up your mind (incorrectly, I might add) 18:40:23 NP: [Don Omar Feat. Tego Calderon - Bandaleros] [The Fast And The Furious- Tokyo Drift] [224kbps] DeaDBeeF 0.5.6-3jane 18:40:41 *** GHOSTnew has quit (Input/output error) 18:41:25 complex: the simplest answer I can give you is "no, it is not going to be untraceable if you keep refusing to try and understand the subject matter" 18:41:39 because quite simply you're missing knowledge of the internals 18:41:56 yes, so therefore i have to assume its insecure 18:42:34 and therefore dont take any risks 18:42:36 complex: no, therefore you have to try and understand what makes it secure or insecure 18:42:44 best not use an operating system then 18:42:50 unless you wish to intentionally not invest any effort in learning about the internals of the topic you're asking about 18:42:51 you don't know how it works, must be insecure 18:42:59 *** iceTwy has quit (Ping timeout) 18:43:13 complex; the insecurity issue doesn't lie with Bitcoin; it lies with your refusal to make an effort to understand it 18:43:33 joepie91: i have never said im not willing to try to understand the mechanics 18:43:41 go read them then 18:43:50 ask questions once you are done reading 18:43:59 (unrelated, in the category of fucking useless responses: https://iceb.in/paste/MfpjzcIo#isbjW+MDWs4wYG50eyC46CgiEwmRrNfU1UxfYauQfdY= ) 18:44:22 complex: no, you haven't *said* that you're not willing to, you've *shown* it 18:44:31 *** GHOSTnew (GHOSTnew@GHOSTnew.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 18:44:48 by constantly jumping to conclusions, trying to extract a "yes" or "no" even after I explicitly point out multiple times that the answer is not that simple 18:45:04 rather than asking for elaboration 18:45:04 if that doesn't show unwillingness to understand the mechanics, I don't know what does 18:45:21 :| 18:45:36 hell, as I said, I was in the process of trying to explain it to you 18:45:44 and you made that impossible by basically cutting off the discussion 18:46:11 i have a feeling you wont explain it now 18:46:41 complex: not until I get the impression that you're actually interested in reading/understanding it 18:46:59 which I haven't gotten so far 18:47:27 thats okay 18:54:43 joepie91, "B needs to do some post-processing before sending the data from C back to A" <-- if it's not C doing the sending, I think B should be able to do it in any case 18:55:14 dealer are pub (send to all), so you probably don't need these there 18:55:25 MK_FG: you are familiar with 0mq? 18:55:30 Yep 18:55:34 ah, handy :) 18:56:13 anyway, the message path is A -> B -> C -> B -> A 18:56:17 I say push/pull or router, in latter case you just do addressing, in former pick which socket to use 18:56:47 how would push/pull work in this case? as it needs to be bidirectional (req/rep pattern really) 18:57:17 You open two sockets - one push, one pull and send some id with each request 18:57:34 Just like TCP stream socket with http pipelining on top 18:58:36 MK_FG: there may be many instances of A and many instances of C 18:58:43 that doesn't seem to work with that architecture? 18:58:48 router will allow you to open just one socket for server, so might be good if you have like 9000 things connection to B 18:58:52 *connecting 18:59:09 MK_FG: I've completely lost you :P 18:59:10 Well, it works, just not that well, yeah 18:59:14 can you explain your idea as verbosely as you can? 18:59:20 well that was a redundant question 18:59:26 *** escape has quit (Ping timeout) 18:59:28 can you explain your idea as verbosely as reasonably possible? 18:59:35 lol 19:00:05 Ok, in case of router 19:00:16 You open one router socket on B 19:00:57 Each A also opens router because it should be able to make async requests 19:01:36 Each A sends message like "B, null, (msg_id, msg)" to deliver request to B 19:01:50 *** escape (tor@AA590F93.362B7402.283603DB.IP) has joined #crytocc 19:02:11 B receives "A1, null, (msg_id, msg)" (A above = A1) 19:02:34 B does whatever else and sends back "A1, null, (msg_id, msg_reply)" 19:02:51 A receives "B, null, (msg_id, msg_reply)" 19:03:15 Should A need to send more requests to B - it sends "B, null, (msg_id2, msg2)"... 19:03:35 And B does same thing, sending back reply with msg_id2 19:03:53 That "(msg_id, msg)" thing is outside 0mq 19:04:16 But addressing in "address, null, msg" is 0mq thing with router sockets 19:04:19 okay, so basically you have a router talking to a router? 19:04:37 Yeah, router can actually talk to e.g. req or whatevers 19:04:59 But if you have req on A, you can't send two requests w/o getting answer for req1 19:05:21 So has to be either router or some push/pull pairs 19:05:48 MK_FG: I'm going to mull over this for a few minutes, thanks for the help so far :P 19:06:35 In unlikely case when you have super-good network, maybe you can just use dealer on B and send like "(msg_id, msg_reply)" from dealer... 19:06:42 ...and every A client will get it 19:07:10 ....but as only A1 knows msg_id, it'll be the only one that not discards it 19:07:19 But that's like super inefficient :P 19:07:20 mmmm... MK_FG: let's say that each A only has to req/rep once but there can be many As, but all of them are processed asynchronously by B 19:07:33 would the correct approach be a REQ on A talking to a ROUTER on B 19:07:43 Yes, sounds like it 19:07:47 and then having B unpack the message and craft a reply itself with data gotten from elsewhere, then sending it back to A? 19:08:00 Each A can actually open new req for each request to B 19:08:01 and would the only way to do that be to build an envelope myself? 19:08:12 (on B) 19:08:26 Yeah 19:08:34 Only way with router 19:08:49 Router always needs address and gets address iirc 19:08:54 I see 19:09:01 So no way around stripping/attaching these 19:09:01 and this is possible in Python also, I assume? :P 19:09:08 Totally 19:09:45 My 0mq can be way rusty (for like 2y), but I don't think they move fast ;) 19:10:16 And when they do, they apparently do forks like xs.io and nanomsg :P 19:10:35 MK_FG: do you by any chance know where to find example code for envelope creation/stripping? quick ctrl+F in guide hasn't turned up anything yet 19:10:36 and, heh 19:12:59 Weird, I think guide was more useful before 19:16:46 http://zguide.zeromq.org/py:rtreq 19:17:24 time.sleep(1) # Give 0MQ/2.0.x time to flush output 19:17:27 * joepie91 raises eyebrow 19:18:01 Note the: client.send(address, zmq.SNDMORE) + client.send("", zmq.SNDMORE) + client.send(stuff) 19:18:08 yeah 19:18:10 That's that (address, null, msg) 19:18:36 zmq is actually kinda clever in how it does things 19:19:11 With python or whatever, it loads lib, which starts its own totally separate thread in a bg 19:19:25 Not python or whatever interpreter thread, thread from a lib 19:19:34 And that thread does all i/o as it pleases 19:19:44 Hence the cop-outs with delays like that 19:20:30 Like, if you don't use that delay, python will die along with that thread and it won't send the stuff it should 19:20:40 Or, ideally, you'd get some ack and then die 19:21:23 But if delivery of that last "welp, I died" packet isn't important (i.e. app on the other end can handle you dying suddenly) - just sleep might work 19:21:46 Also, not sure, but iirc there was an explicit zmq.flush() or something 19:22:02 (which blocked until all bg thread queues came clean) 19:28:02 Oh, that's right, it has ZMQ_LINGER sockopt for that 19:29:01 Which I think should work as "timeout to send queued-in-thread stuff" when you do context.term() 19:29:02 network maintenance incoming 19:29:11 (MK_FG: will read up in a sec) 19:29:18 *** probably has quit (nexus.cryto.net box.cryto.net) 19:29:18 *** stanone has quit (nexus.cryto.net box.cryto.net) 19:29:18 *** jimirus has quit (nexus.cryto.net box.cryto.net) 19:29:18 *** connor has quit (nexus.cryto.net box.cryto.net) 19:29:18 *** lblissett has quit (nexus.cryto.net box.cryto.net) 19:29:18 *** staticsafe has quit (nexus.cryto.net box.cryto.net) 19:29:24 *** probably (asdf@cryto-327F1408.chrismail.de) has joined #crytocc 19:29:29 *** LapAnon (Grep@cryto-812F49C0.carolina.res.rr.com) has joined #crytocc 19:29:30 *** staticsafe (ss@cryto-56866F57.asininetech.com) has joined #crytocc 19:29:33 *** jimirus (jimirus@206CF2F6.AA517E7E.DB3C1458.IP) has joined #crytocc 19:29:45 *** lblissett (lblissett@B2428868.F002DDDB.5C2325A5.IP) has joined #crytocc 19:30:20 *** connor (c@BA2D26D0.339A30FF.B40044C0.IP) has joined #crytocc 19:30:20 okay 19:34:20 MK_FG: right 19:34:23 useful to know :P 19:34:58 also there will be some node restarts in a bit 19:36:12 It might seem really dumb thing to keep that bg thread from what I'm explaining above, but I think key there is 100% consistency (they don't reimplement anything) and lightspeed performance of that thing 19:36:40 I think I linked the thing here before in a similar convo, but... 19:37:23 MK_FG: the IRC leaf you are on is about to restart 19:37:36 see you in a bit :P 19:39:06 *** loggy (loggy@5C4B2CE4.B8E60B3B.FD9B6484.IP) has joined #crytocc 19:39:06 Topic for #crytocc is: Cryto Coding Collective | THIS IS A PUBLICALLY LOGGED CHANNEL. http://wire.cryto.net/logs | http://cryto.net/, http://forums.cryto.net/ | Rules: no Anonymous, no cracking, no drama | Now, with more dpk! | Cryto Research: http://research.cryto.net/ | RIP Aaron Swartz 19:39:06 Users on #crytocc: loggy Asad pzuraq jimirus lblissett daemon ElectRo` LapAnon vld joepie91 Sue tintin truetravesty captainobvious GHOSTnew &botpie91 fr0z3n achus IR601 mikaa staticsafe probably &MK_FG @SpaghettiCode lysobit connor 19:39:17 *** Sonic (Mcloven@cryto-9F42E372.static.internode.on.net) has joined #crytocc 19:39:17 *** d0wn|off (d0wn_blog@cryto-256AD0BA.static.lu) has joined #crytocc 19:39:22 MK_FG: hehe 19:39:27 *** d0wn|off is now known as d0wn 19:39:38 Even though sending is literally socket.sendmsg(where, bytes) 19:39:56 Yet that bg thread batches things in huge tcp packets and does it way faster 19:40:32 MK_FG: generally pretty impressed with zeromq so far performance-wise, it's pretty close to 'magic' :) 19:40:53 also, announcement, SSL certs are fixed now 19:41:06 cc cayce and iceTwy neither of which appear to have reconnected 19:41:16 *** foolex (foolex@5D6B0912.EC145393.9A74EEF1.IP) has joined #crytocc 19:41:20 so uh, yeah :P 19:42:42 *** escape (tor@AA590F93.362B7402.283603DB.IP) has joined #crytocc 19:42:43 *** zxcvbnm (zxcvbnm@9F88BA40.33FD1BC3.D4256504.IP) has joined #crytocc 19:42:46 *** niveus (niveus@niveus.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 19:43:01 *** cayce (cayce@cayce.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 19:43:32 *** Zekka (zekka@Zekka.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 19:44:23 hi cayce, welcome back 19:44:35 SSL cert werk now 19:44:58 kk 19:45:04 :P 19:45:17 ipv6 still takes years 19:45:18 [11:38:01] * Connecting to irc.cryto.net (2607:f7a0:1:1::24:6) port 6697... 19:45:19 [11:42:16] * * Subject: /C=NL/O=Cryto/OU=IRC/CN=irc.cryto.net 19:45:30 mm. 19:45:39 wel hey, it connects! 19:45:42 well * 19:45:56 * cayce laughs 19:46:11 Probably involves some chinaman seeing led blip and replugging cable somewhere 19:46:14 cayce: and it serves you a cert that is valid for the hostname! 19:46:20 that is an improvement! 19:46:37 MK_FG: hehe 19:46:48 but needs to finish his coffee first 19:47:19 Yeah, can be already drunk this time of night, too 19:48:19 MK_FG: if a message is routed through multiple router/dealer sets, what do the message parts look like? 19:48:26 afaik it would have an addressing chain 19:48:42 are these all grouped into one part (ie. one recv) or a part for each until terminator (null)? 19:48:44 It's never routed with normal sockets 19:48:47 I thought the latter 19:48:53 but unsure 19:49:17 MK_FG: assuming you send from A -> B -> C -> D -> E and B,C,D are all router/dealer sets just proxying on the message from A to E 19:49:31 theoretical scenario 19:49:31 :P 19:50:08 Yeah, fairly sure you have to receive msg on each hop, slap new address (for routers) and send it from next socket 19:50:30 I think they had some prefab parts for simple tasks like that 19:50:38 MK_FG: what I'm trying to understand is what the message will look like when it reaches E 19:50:40 But these don't look anything like sockets 19:50:51 two possibilities: 19:50:58 Well, you receive it on B from A 19:51:03 A,B,C,D | NULL | messagebody 19:51:06 What do you want it to look like? 19:51:12 A | B | C | D | NULL | messagebody 19:51:18 I mean, you can mangle it on each hop however 19:51:21 which of these two is it, | being a separator for recv()s 19:51:32 MK_FG; see above options 19:51:37 that's what I'm trying to figure out 19:52:03 is the addressing chain packed into one part (one recv()) or does each hop in the addressing chain have its own part 19:52:21 You receive message on B as "A, null, msg".... 19:53:07 ...and there you can either send "C, null, msg" to C or maybe send it "C, null, A, null, msg", or maybe "C, null, whatever" 19:53:18 (assuming it's all router sockets) 19:54:09 I don't see why'd you even have some "chain" - you can build it, sure 19:54:21 But otherwise, fairly sure zmq won't build it for you 19:55:08 But maybe I'm wrong and routers do that if you connect each one to the next 19:55:15 Or maybe it's some new thing 19:55:48 Might be easier to test and find in docs afterwards, come to think of it :P 19:58:09 MK_FG: looks like convention is D | NULL | C | NULL | B | NULL | A | NULL | messagebody 19:58:19 per http://zguide.zeromq.org/page:all#toc55 19:58:41 *** complex (litehode@complex.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 20:00:22 *** mama (me@65B6DF3.80049B54.D7AE551D.IP) has joined #crytocc 20:00:40 Convention sounds fishy - meaning that you'd have to know all the hops before sending the packet to build that ^^^? 20:01:01 (quite possibly you can, e.g. cjdns does that) 20:01:02 *** DrWhat (Snake@DrWhat.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 20:01:28 But it sounds like something that defy packet switching dogmas! 20:02:02 MK_FG: no 20:02:08 each hop appends itself 20:02:13 when proxying it through 20:02:18 to build a 'return path' 20:02:19 for the reply 20:02:33 so that the reply goes back over the same path and ends up at the right place 20:02:36 in* 20:03:01 Ah, fair enough, though still blasphemous 20:05:49 It actually sounds like a silly thing to do if you can connect A to D at some point 20:10:36 MK_FG: this was a hypothetical scenario assuming there was no way to reasonably do that :) 20:12:31 Yeah, it's how all proxying works anyway 20:12:53 sync req-response all the way down 20:14:31 *** ChauffeR (ChauffeR@can.i.haz.a.cuddle) has joined #crytocc 20:15:42 ChauffeR: ohai! 20:15:47 hello 20:15:53 .welcome ChauffeR 20:15:54 ChauffeR: welcome to #crytocc! Please be aware that this channel is publicly logged, and make sure to read the rules in the channel topic. You may hide messages from the public logs by prefixing them with [off]. 20:16:00 NSA :( 20:16:07 MK_FG: thanks a lot for your help, I think I have a pretty good idea of how to go about stuff now :) 20:16:14 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 15.2258 s, 70.5 MB/s 20:16:17 * ChauffeR shakes fist 20:16:23 (and it's certainly a much more useful response than what I got in #zeromq :P) 20:16:37 I think I should actually be there... 20:16:41 hehe 20:16:53 :) 20:17:04 Just have znc always detached 20:17:08 also, I do have to be fair - despite this one episode of wtf-useless-answer, pieterh is generally very helpful 20:17:18 so I won't chalk it down to the channel overall 20:20:19 http://www.scei.co.jp/ps4-license/ 20:21:53 right, I think it's time for me to make a shower and eat 20:21:55 er 20:21:57 take a shower, even 20:22:04 making a shower would be a significantly different activity 20:22:09 :P 20:28:07 *** GHOSTnew has quit (User quit: Quitte) 20:30:49 *** GHOSTnew (GHOSTnew@GHOSTnew.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 20:41:14 *** iceTwy (iceTwy@cryto-610769D0.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #crytocc 20:58:29 iceTwy: SSL fixed 21:17:32 .tw https://twitter.com/iamdevloper/status/402178793294794752 21:17:33 11.30pm: "I'll just fix this one tiny CSS bug...", 4.30am: "I hate CSS and everything it stands for." (@iamdevloper) 21:20:15 *** pzuraq has quit (Connection reset by peer) 21:20:27 joepie91: nice & that tweet is so true :D 21:20:36 *** pzuraq (pzuraq@cryto-D2623541.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #crytocc 21:21:32 yes :P 21:22:46 uuuh 21:22:50 what am I better off doing 21:23:06 getting an USB stick with an i686 Arch Linux Live CD 21:23:15 or create an i686 Arch Linux chroot 21:23:21 to compile 32 bits packages 21:24:39 iceTwy: http://openbuildservice.org/2012/09/10/arch-linux-support/ 21:25:02 :) 21:27:28 joepie91: so wait 21:27:35 can I actually have a repo with everything I need in there? 21:27:45 iceTwy: yes 21:27:46 I mean, with every custom package I need? 21:27:52 and it compiles them for meh? 21:27:54 o.o 21:27:56 yes 21:28:08 this is a hosted instance: https://build.opensuse.org/ (which I presume runs the latest version of OBS) 21:28:11 but you can also run OBS yourself 21:28:14 (in theory anyway) 21:29:07 iceTwy: it's basically an automated distributed build system for multiple architectures and package formats 21:29:15 it's pretty awesome 21:29:16 holy crap 21:29:17 uses Xen I think 21:29:18 nice 21:29:20 to set up environments 21:29:28 and sets up a clean environment for each build 21:29:46 so no cross-contamination or missing build deps that you didn't realize existed because you already had them installed locally 21:29:51 :P 21:30:12 *** ElectRo` has quit (Ping timeout) 21:40:41 err.. 21:40:45 how do I sign up? lol 21:40:59 I'm logged into the Novell website, but oddly, not into openSuSE 21:41:30 oh man 21:41:36 I just figured out what wayland/weston is 21:41:52 *** pzuraq has quit (Input/output error) 21:41:56 they're taking xorg and applying the unix principle to it 21:42:10 turn it into a simple interface, for which there can be competing implementations 21:42:36 fucking yes 21:43:01 cayce: http://international.sueddeutsche.de/post/67252337070/the-contractor-spies-hackers-for-hire-and-a-shadow 21:43:11 iceTwy: oh, Novells sign-in system is a fucking mess 21:43:21 just login to OBS again with your regular Novell credentials 21:43:26 it should eventually work 21:44:06 oh hot 21:44:16 kde platform 5 will be wayland0y 21:44:18 -y 21:44:39 * cayce may try 4.12 when it golds 21:45:06 whoop 21:45:13 it just won't let me joepie91 21:45:15 lol 21:45:17 wtf 21:45:19 with 2 diff accounts 21:45:24 iceTwy: error not specific enough 21:45:25 on both FF and Chromium 21:45:28 well, okay 21:45:31 :P 21:45:37 on https://build.opensuse.org/, I'm trying to login 21:46:02 entered my credentials 40 times, but it just doesn't log me in, it instead redirects me to https://build.opensuse.org/ 21:46:07 damn, I want 187.30 per hour for hacking other nationstates 21:46:16 iceTwy: what happens when you enter randomstuff 21:46:20 a week of that and my school is paid for 21:46:34 joepie91: lemme see 21:46:38 also, try https://build.opensuse.org/ICSLogin/auth-up 21:46:56 joepie91: error with invalid stuff 21:47:08 iceTwy: same here 21:47:13 are you -sure- you are not logged in yet 21:47:15 and 3.13 is going to be as hot as 3.12, and 3.14 is going to begin port work to blk-mq hotness 21:47:19 because when you login it sends you back to home 21:47:20 without a message 21:47:21 wtf 21:47:31 I am logged in, probably 21:47:36 but why doesn't it show that I'm logged in?! 21:47:37 iceTwy: F5 on homepage 21:47:43 shfit+F5 actually 21:47:45 shift * 21:47:52 shit+f5 21:48:04 nothing 21:48:06 :s 21:48:14 hmm 21:48:48 shitf5 21:48:49 :P 21:48:58 * joepie91 calls next project shitf5 21:49:04 xD 21:49:09 iceTwy: clear cookies try again? 21:49:15 "have you tried turning it off and on again?" 21:49:19 yup, cookies are automatically cleared when I leave Chromium 21:49:49 iceTwy: clear them explicitly 21:49:53 for build.opensuse.org 21:49:57 hm 21:50:29 done 21:50:31 still nothing 21:50:33 wow wtf opensuse 21:51:12 one sec 21:52:13 "Not Found 21:52:14 The requested URL /nl/cgi-bin/webscr was not found on this server." 21:52:15 good job paypal 21:53:26 haxed 21:53:54 still not 21:54:23 * cayce tries installing nvidia-331 21:54:39 soon: linux 3.12 21:54:47 soon: broken 21:54:48 :D 21:55:03 :D 21:55:07 but I get extent caching! 21:55:09 WORTH IT 21:55:17 iceTwy: no idea why it doesn't work there, worksforme 21:55:42 blergh 21:55:56 wat 21:55:57 linux-image-goldfish - Linux kernel image for the goldfish kernel. 21:56:15 * cayce installs that one for extra fishbowl power 21:56:33 your goldfish now lives up to 1 century longer! 21:56:53 D: 21:57:18 * cayce wonders about 3.12.1 21:57:23 today would be the day >_> 21:57:27 cayce: goldfish kernel... is that like /dev/null-as-a-service? 21:57:31 :D 21:57:37 forgets anything you throw at it after 4 seconds 21:57:43 I hope so, I would have amazing QOS 21:57:58 do that and charge for SLA 21:58:00 :D 21:58:09 cayce: http://devnull-as-a-service.com/ 21:58:36 also 3.13 may have a blocking /dev/random finally 21:58:41 fucking linux 21:58:56 they're going to turn linux's random into freebsd's random, like it should be 21:59:20 random is a block device which blocks with insufficient entropy, urandom has multiple sources and will use prng in absence of sufficient random 21:59:49 >3 21:59:51 <3 * 22:00:38 anyway, I'm just putting off my hw 22:00:39 lol 22:01:18 agh 22:01:28 I know I'm going to build 3.12 and it's going to be 3.12.1 2 hours later 22:01:30 e.e 22:01:50 lelele 22:01:56 i've got 3.12.0 here 22:01:58 runs fine 22:02:44 yes, so does 11.6 22:02:49 3.11.6 22:02:52 but 3.11.8 is out 22:02:54 :| 22:03:24 Linux ono-sendai 3.11.6 #1 SMP Sat Nov 2 09:51:45 PDT 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 22:03:50 I need to redo my .config though 22:03:56 need to figure out how to get cd rom support 22:03:59 lel 22:07:18 *** complex_ (litehode@1FB20456.69AC617A.F6E1C77B.IP) has joined #crytocc 22:08:34 what the fucking hell is wrong with suse 22:08:38 ffs 22:09:02 OH GOD FINALLY 22:09:03 YAAYAYAYAYAYAYA 22:09:26 this may kill everything 22:09:34 or not 22:09:37 or not 22:09:37 * cayce hits enter 22:09:49 *** complex has quit (Ping timeout) 22:09:59 new nvidia drivers 22:10:10 it's cool, though 22:10:25 I ran the update in screen that way if it kills my ui the update will still success 22:17:23 *** complex_ has quit (User quit: ) 22:17:48 fuck yeah 22:18:24 what the hell opensuse 22:21:15 *** iceTwy has quit (User quit: Disconnecting from server) 22:21:19 *** iceTwy (iceTwy@cryto-610769D0.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #crytocc 22:23:43 lol joepie91 22:23:51 build is the only opensuse service I can't log into 22:27:03 * joepie91 claps 22:27:27 heh 22:28:12 boop 22:29:48 beep 22:31:54 bloop 22:32:47 *** cayce has quit (User quit: Three sheets to the wind) 22:39:39 *** Zekka has quit (Ping timeout) 22:41:36 *** Zekka (zekka@Zekka.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 22:54:33 wtf. 22:54:38 in 2001 22:54:43 "Live365.com has decided that I am a bad person. First they sent me this cease and desist letter. Then to make sure I "felt" it they shutdown my dad's stream. 22:54:43 What the fuck do I do? If you have any suggestions help me out here." 22:54:51 c&d: http://streamripper.sourceforge.net/dc.php 22:55:01 stream shutdown: http://streamripper.sourceforge.net/termnotice.php 22:58:21 *** cayce (cayce@cayce.users.cryto) has joined #crytocc 22:58:43 joepie91:) cert is self signed :< 22:59:02 took me 5 minutes to fail cert validation, and another 5 to reconnect after disabling cert validation 22:59:11 lmao\ 23:00:08 .bitcoin 23:00:09 1 BTC = $479.45, 1 BTC = €390.00 23:01:51 Last price:$533.10000 23:01:54 anyway 23:02:04 goxlast is well over 500 23:02:26 sorta wish my bank verif would go through ;D 23:04:50 so we made fun of asrock for making a btc mining mobo 23:04:59 and then http://www.amd.com/us/press-releases/Pages/amd-announces-server-graphics-card-2013nov14.aspx?cmpid=social14543734 happened 23:07:19 cayce: yes, cert is self-signed 23:07:21 fuck CA model 23:07:39 cayce: also, goxlast is irrelevant 23:07:48 problem: I have to invalidate entire security model for "security" 23:07:59 hexchat has no... cert pinning 23:08:13 (which is what we'd want in this situation) 23:08:28 mhmm 23:08:31 go complain at dev 23:08:32 :) 23:08:49 no 23:08:56 he gets no complaints from me 23:09:11 he broke the config file format in a minor release and refused to build a converter for the next minor release 23:09:25 fuck him 23:10:24 !winamp next 23:10:27 Wups 23:16:54 So this actually happened. 23:16:58 .title http://www.wwlp.com/news/massachusetts/mass-pd-pays-ransom-to-reverse-virus 23:17:01 lysobit: Mass. PD pays 'ransom' to reverse virus | WWLP.com 23:27:54 *** Riddler (Riddler@cryto-1D9B597A.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #crytocc 23:27:57 hello 23:31:10 *** iceTwy has quit (Ping timeout) 23:33:28 "for the perfect bit of chicken or meat" 23:33:29 wat... 23:34:56 lysobit: classy 23:35:17 lysobit saw you on TV man... very professional. 23:43:54 *** Riddler has parted #crytocc () 23:59:47 I need a new laptop, any suggestions on what I should get? 23:59:53 joepie91 iceTwy DrWhat